Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Re-match Pack vs Vikings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quientus" data-source="post: 253759" data-attributes="member: 1834"><p>Rodgers isn't more efficient in the RedZone compared to Favre ... - so you are wrong there ... - Look up the stats in the RedZone please ...;</p><p> </p><p>RedZone Effeciency:</p><p> </p><p>Favre: 9/14 (64,29%) 24 yards / 5 TD / 1 Sck - 15 yards lost / 1 fumble - 1 fumble lost</p><p> </p><p>Rodgers: 7/12 (58,33%) 20 yards / 3 TD / 3 Sck - 24 yards lost / 1 fumble - 1 fumble lost</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>- Again those numbers don't tell the "whole story", however, they should be included when you determine "ratings" nevertheless ... </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Packers going from 2006 into the 2007 season was close to being identical with a few minor changes ... - So for *your* statement to ring true, that would mean Rodgers should at the very least have gotten atleast a winning record (9-7) out of that team ...</p><p> </p><p>Another point is Matt Cassel in New England when Brady went down ... - New England faired pretty well with him, and everyone was starting to believe how great a quarterback Matt Cassel was ... - Then he went to Kansas City ... and the rest if history ...</p><p> </p><p>Kyle Orton was being "hammered" while with the Bears ... - Yet on the Bronco's Kyle Orton is doing pretty damn well ...</p><p> </p><p>Jay Cutler on the other hand is struggling at best in Chicago atm ... - But I still think Cutler is a way better Quarterback than Kyle Orton ...</p><p> </p><p>Everyone has been "all over" Romo for not "performing" ... however, he has had some pretty good "stats" ... but without wins ... Yet everyone is "railing" on about how Romo is a "bust" ... - Yet in the last game Romo DID come up big and had a huge part in winning the game ...</p><p> </p><p>Not to mention Drew Brees with the Saints ... - Did anyone see Drew Brees' rating in that game ? - Yet Brees did come through in the end ... regardless ..., and the Saints won against the Dolphins ...</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Fact remains ... at THIS point in the season ... Rodgers isn't the better quarterback, *when* you compare him to Favre *at this point* in the season ...</p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>For all intent and purposes ... that was the right decision to make ... - At that time from a business point of view ... however ... when you look at the ineptitude from the Front Office during the last season, as well as the off season going into this season, not to mention the lack of "will" to really do much about improving the o-line, it doesn't make much sense ... - 5th year into the "rebuilding" ... and the problems on the Packers team are still the same ... - From a business stand point ... - that would indicate that it isn't the players that are the problem, however, it's the management and coaching ...</p><p> </p><p>And if we are going to stay on the "business" stand point ... There isn't a board of directors out there, who would let such a thing happen to any business for that long, without taking actions ...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quientus, post: 253759, member: 1834"] Rodgers isn't more efficient in the RedZone compared to Favre ... - so you are wrong there ... - Look up the stats in the RedZone please ...; RedZone Effeciency: Favre: 9/14 (64,29%) 24 yards / 5 TD / 1 Sck - 15 yards lost / 1 fumble - 1 fumble lost Rodgers: 7/12 (58,33%) 20 yards / 3 TD / 3 Sck - 24 yards lost / 1 fumble - 1 fumble lost - Again those numbers don't tell the "whole story", however, they should be included when you determine "ratings" nevertheless ... The Packers going from 2006 into the 2007 season was close to being identical with a few minor changes ... - So for *your* statement to ring true, that would mean Rodgers should at the very least have gotten atleast a winning record (9-7) out of that team ... Another point is Matt Cassel in New England when Brady went down ... - New England faired pretty well with him, and everyone was starting to believe how great a quarterback Matt Cassel was ... - Then he went to Kansas City ... and the rest if history ... Kyle Orton was being "hammered" while with the Bears ... - Yet on the Bronco's Kyle Orton is doing pretty damn well ... Jay Cutler on the other hand is struggling at best in Chicago atm ... - But I still think Cutler is a way better Quarterback than Kyle Orton ... Everyone has been "all over" Romo for not "performing" ... however, he has had some pretty good "stats" ... but without wins ... Yet everyone is "railing" on about how Romo is a "bust" ... - Yet in the last game Romo DID come up big and had a huge part in winning the game ... Not to mention Drew Brees with the Saints ... - Did anyone see Drew Brees' rating in that game ? - Yet Brees did come through in the end ... regardless ..., and the Saints won against the Dolphins ... Fact remains ... at THIS point in the season ... Rodgers isn't the better quarterback, *when* you compare him to Favre *at this point* in the season ... For all intent and purposes ... that was the right decision to make ... - At that time from a business point of view ... however ... when you look at the ineptitude from the Front Office during the last season, as well as the off season going into this season, not to mention the lack of "will" to really do much about improving the o-line, it doesn't make much sense ... - 5th year into the "rebuilding" ... and the problems on the Packers team are still the same ... - From a business stand point ... - that would indicate that it isn't the players that are the problem, however, it's the management and coaching ... And if we are going to stay on the "business" stand point ... There isn't a board of directors out there, who would let such a thing happen to any business for that long, without taking actions ... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
Dukefan12
PackerDNA
RepStar15
jack6615
Half Empty
Latest posts
P
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: PackerDNA
2 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: PikeBadger
30 minutes ago
Draft Talk
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: PikeBadger
39 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:04 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: milani
Today at 6:56 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Re-match Pack vs Vikings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top