Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Quentin Nelson
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 762994" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>I agree that there isn’t a <em>need</em> to change the approach at guard under Campen, but there comes a point where the value is so good that you do it anyways, in my opinion. If you can get a guy who is an elite pass protector like Sitton while also being an elite run blocker, I would say that’s enough value added to make the pick easily. If you’re getting Zack Martin, it’s worth it. </p><p></p><p>I brought up the other players just by way of making the point that the league seems to value OG more than RB, SS, or LB. It’s conventional wisdom that guard isn’t valued in the league, but the money that’s being handed out says otherwise. So if guard isn’t valuable enough to draft at 14, then why are people fine with running backs or SS/LB’s?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 762994, member: 12283"] I agree that there isn’t a [I]need[/I] to change the approach at guard under Campen, but there comes a point where the value is so good that you do it anyways, in my opinion. If you can get a guy who is an elite pass protector like Sitton while also being an elite run blocker, I would say that’s enough value added to make the pick easily. If you’re getting Zack Martin, it’s worth it. I brought up the other players just by way of making the point that the league seems to value OG more than RB, SS, or LB. It’s conventional wisdom that guard isn’t valued in the league, but the money that’s being handed out says otherwise. So if guard isn’t valuable enough to draft at 14, then why are people fine with running backs or SS/LB’s? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
U.P. Packfan
TEXPAC2
Latest posts
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: Poppa San
46 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Interesting Facebook Page
Latest: Poppa San
51 minutes ago
Forum Feedback & Suggestions
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 6:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: GBkrzygrl
Today at 3:54 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 1:10 PM
College Sports
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Quentin Nelson
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top