Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Peter King's take on all of this
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="johnny_blood" data-source="post: 231060" data-attributes="member: 913"><p>Another detriment you have to admit is that time was spent developing the offense to feature Rodgers' peculiar talents. </p><p></p><p>That is a cost, but I think the costs altogether are more than offset by Favre being the superior QB. Players are more important than offseason scheming.</p><p></p><p>As for Favre playing poorly in the cold, almost everyone else on the team also played poorly in the two cold games last year. Favre brought the team back from three deficits in their coldest game, a game in which the team was not good and we went back to having no running game. I was at the Soldier Field game until the bitter end, and Favre was not the only one blowing it out there. </p><p></p><p>If Favre wants to play, I want him starting for us because he gives us the best chance to win, which offsets all the sunk costs incurred during his "retirement."</p><p></p><p>If not then I think Rodgers will have a very nice season, and will be very crafty and smart for a first year starter. Get on board or shut your mouth!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="johnny_blood, post: 231060, member: 913"] Another detriment you have to admit is that time was spent developing the offense to feature Rodgers' peculiar talents. That is a cost, but I think the costs altogether are more than offset by Favre being the superior QB. Players are more important than offseason scheming. As for Favre playing poorly in the cold, almost everyone else on the team also played poorly in the two cold games last year. Favre brought the team back from three deficits in their coldest game, a game in which the team was not good and we went back to having no running game. I was at the Soldier Field game until the bitter end, and Favre was not the only one blowing it out there. If Favre wants to play, I want him starting for us because he gives us the best chance to win, which offsets all the sunk costs incurred during his "retirement." If not then I think Rodgers will have a very nice season, and will be very crafty and smart for a first year starter. Get on board or shut your mouth! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
mradtke66
tynimiller
Latest posts
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: AmishMafia
42 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Time to call Brett back from the woodshed....
Latest: longtimefan
55 minutes ago
Brett Favre Discussion
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: King of Jeans
Today at 7:01 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:55 AM
Draft Talk
H
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:45 AM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Peter King's take on all of this
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top