Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers want to speed up offense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 560710" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p>I don’t know but I do know you aren’t dealing with the contradictions I pointed out in your posts. For example, you posted 'the numbers dictate that more plays equal more yards, more TDs, and more wins'. I pointed out with facts that that was only true for one team last season. If you don’t like the facts of the most recent season regarding the number of plays the Seahawks ran, check the facts of the 2013 Eagles who finished 13th in plays but were 2nd in yards gained and 4th in points scored. You haven’t answered that point. What you did do is change your story to “…back to the base point of Lacy being the back breaker”. I pointed out that in your first post on this thread you posted, “The whole ball control thing is becoming <em>obsolete along with the running game</em>.” You haven’t answered that point either since your base point seems to be the importance of the passing game. So whether or not you are repeating yourself you seem to be unable to respond to challenges to what you have posted.</p><p></p><p>You also seem a bit confused: You posted, “But as in any odds, the odds can be broken. And you cant hardly go back and check odds on the past, because 3 years ago when I said we should use the passing game to open up the run, everyone scoffed…” When I asked what you meant by "the odds" you post you meant the odds of Seattle beating Denver a certain number of times. Go back and read your post #29 and tell us how we were supposed to know that’s what you meant. BTW, if the two teams that lined up in that Super Bowl played 10 times, I would expect Seattle to win it 7 or 8 times. Aren’t you an armchair GM too?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 560710, member: 4300"] I don’t know but I do know you aren’t dealing with the contradictions I pointed out in your posts. For example, you posted 'the numbers dictate that more plays equal more yards, more TDs, and more wins'. I pointed out with facts that that was only true for one team last season. If you don’t like the facts of the most recent season regarding the number of plays the Seahawks ran, check the facts of the 2013 Eagles who finished 13th in plays but were 2nd in yards gained and 4th in points scored. You haven’t answered that point. What you did do is change your story to “…back to the base point of Lacy being the back breaker”. I pointed out that in your first post on this thread you posted, “The whole ball control thing is becoming [I]obsolete along with the running game[/I].” You haven’t answered that point either since your base point seems to be the importance of the passing game. So whether or not you are repeating yourself you seem to be unable to respond to challenges to what you have posted. You also seem a bit confused: You posted, “But as in any odds, the odds can be broken. And you cant hardly go back and check odds on the past, because 3 years ago when I said we should use the passing game to open up the run, everyone scoffed…” When I asked what you meant by "the odds" you post you meant the odds of Seattle beating Denver a certain number of times. Go back and read your post #29 and tell us how we were supposed to know that’s what you meant. BTW, if the two teams that lined up in that Super Bowl played 10 times, I would expect Seattle to win it 7 or 8 times. Aren’t you an armchair GM too? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
GreenBaySlacker
Green_Bay_Packers
Emur
Team Ronny
Sanguine camper
tynimiller
JoePack
shockerx
Latest posts
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: DoURant
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
G
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
3 minutes ago
Draft Talk
S
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Schultz
53 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: XPack
Today at 9:26 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Green Bay to Host '25 Draft!
Latest: weeds
Today at 9:26 AM
NFL Discussions
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers want to speed up offense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top