Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers want to speed up offense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreenBaySlacker" data-source="post: 560696" data-attributes="member: 9780"><p>Odds. You can have something that 9 times out of 10 it happens one way. But theres always the chance it goes the other way. How many times does seattle beat the broncos is they play 10 times? IMO seattle couldn't do what they did again with 100 trys. And before that game, if you asked the odds that seattle wins 48 to 8 or whatever the hell it was, it would be 100/1 or so... That's what I'm talking about. They broke the odds. And I wouldn't write the results of the 29th in plays dominating like that ever again, let alone consistently. And about the time GB blew things wide open in 2011 is when the nfl started realizing running backs were less important, and passing attack was the backbone of a winning team. Was probabally 5+ years ago I was all alone damn near. But yes. 3 years ago there would still be a half dozen old school boys preaching run every time I brought up the pass opening up the run.</p><p> </p><p>And yes, I started posting on yahoo and when they shut down I went to espn and when they died I came here. In yahoo and espn, I had 10 know it all a-holes to every 1 here. and I consistently proved all of them wrong... So yea I generalize "you all", as in all you armchair GMs on the internet. Not the 3 posters on this website.</p><p> </p><p>And this whole 2011 thing where we score 40, and they score 39, we are fine? Way to put words in my mouth... You get me talking about defense, and I'm shutting teams out. Nobody here is claiming 2011 was ok. Offense had it right. Open it up!!! And we got it right now. Open it up!!! Defense failed in 2011. Very similar to the Broncos last year. But this time around we have defensive talent to compliment... And technically, if its the championship game against seattle, 40-39 GB would be fine. And it would take offense and defense to get there. But you seem to twist my intentions when I say I spoke from an offensive standpoint. I was on a kick about more plays raises our odds of scoring. and to add strategy like that to our talent. we can keep the same guys in and run or pass effectively from the same formations. Saying we will get the same production from 15 runs now, as we got from 30 (3+ years ago)when we advertised run with Kuhn and ran into a wall for no gain 10 times a game....So not only do our odds go up on scoring by more plays. Our production on those plays should go up. One reason. #27... Not in a 30 carries a game way. He will get the dump off safety valve for Rodgers. And when we catch them off guard, Lacy will have open field for his properly timed runs. He is the back breaker. He is what the broncos didn't have. He is what the 2011 Packers didn't have. Used right, nobody can stop us. And in that position, I can be a little lackadaisical sounding about defense.</p><p> </p><p>I swear, I'm repeating myself?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreenBaySlacker, post: 560696, member: 9780"] Odds. You can have something that 9 times out of 10 it happens one way. But theres always the chance it goes the other way. How many times does seattle beat the broncos is they play 10 times? IMO seattle couldn't do what they did again with 100 trys. And before that game, if you asked the odds that seattle wins 48 to 8 or whatever the hell it was, it would be 100/1 or so... That's what I'm talking about. They broke the odds. And I wouldn't write the results of the 29th in plays dominating like that ever again, let alone consistently. And about the time GB blew things wide open in 2011 is when the nfl started realizing running backs were less important, and passing attack was the backbone of a winning team. Was probabally 5+ years ago I was all alone damn near. But yes. 3 years ago there would still be a half dozen old school boys preaching run every time I brought up the pass opening up the run. And yes, I started posting on yahoo and when they shut down I went to espn and when they died I came here. In yahoo and espn, I had 10 know it all a-holes to every 1 here. and I consistently proved all of them wrong... So yea I generalize "you all", as in all you armchair GMs on the internet. Not the 3 posters on this website. And this whole 2011 thing where we score 40, and they score 39, we are fine? Way to put words in my mouth... You get me talking about defense, and I'm shutting teams out. Nobody here is claiming 2011 was ok. Offense had it right. Open it up!!! And we got it right now. Open it up!!! Defense failed in 2011. Very similar to the Broncos last year. But this time around we have defensive talent to compliment... And technically, if its the championship game against seattle, 40-39 GB would be fine. And it would take offense and defense to get there. But you seem to twist my intentions when I say I spoke from an offensive standpoint. I was on a kick about more plays raises our odds of scoring. and to add strategy like that to our talent. we can keep the same guys in and run or pass effectively from the same formations. Saying we will get the same production from 15 runs now, as we got from 30 (3+ years ago)when we advertised run with Kuhn and ran into a wall for no gain 10 times a game....So not only do our odds go up on scoring by more plays. Our production on those plays should go up. One reason. #27... Not in a 30 carries a game way. He will get the dump off safety valve for Rodgers. And when we catch them off guard, Lacy will have open field for his properly timed runs. He is the back breaker. He is what the broncos didn't have. He is what the 2011 Packers didn't have. Used right, nobody can stop us. And in that position, I can be a little lackadaisical sounding about defense. I swear, I'm repeating myself? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
GreenBaySlacker
Raleigh NC Packers Fan
Green_Bay_Packers
Pkrjones
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
5 minutes ago
Draft Talk
G
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: Sanguine camper
21 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: DoURant
24 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: DoURant
31 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers want to speed up offense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top