Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers vs Falcons: Studs n Duds: Whats Tanking Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 807210"><p>I cannot say we agree. I do not detect sarcasm in that comment, but I guess I cannot rule it out.</p><p></p><p>Not using the short passing had nothing to do with the sacks in this game. Jailbreaks and rapidly collapsing pockets were the order of the day. These were not 2.5+ seconds, looking for the long ball, sacks.</p><p></p><p>If you're not going to let Rodgers be Rodgers, turning him into a short throw pocket passer, you're bound to be disappointed. Put a defense out there with 2-high safeties and slow LBs and you'll get what you want. We've seen that before. But it doesn't come around very often. And he's going to pass up the open short option if he likes what he sees downfield. That's the way it has always been and its not something you should expect to change.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 807210"] I cannot say we agree. I do not detect sarcasm in that comment, but I guess I cannot rule it out. Not using the short passing had nothing to do with the sacks in this game. Jailbreaks and rapidly collapsing pockets were the order of the day. These were not 2.5+ seconds, looking for the long ball, sacks. If you're not going to let Rodgers be Rodgers, turning him into a short throw pocket passer, you're bound to be disappointed. Put a defense out there with 2-high safeties and slow LBs and you'll get what you want. We've seen that before. But it doesn't come around very often. And he's going to pass up the open short option if he likes what he sees downfield. That's the way it has always been and its not something you should expect to change. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
Arodgers12
Latest posts
OTAs
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 3:02 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Shareholders meeting 2024?
Latest: weeds
Today at 1:19 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Update on Watson's Hamstrngs
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 2:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Aaron Hill !!!
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 1:36 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers vs Falcons: Studs n Duds: Whats Tanking Edition
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top