Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers should have lost
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackinSteel" data-source="post: 35113" data-attributes="member: 415"><p>Alright, Mike Pereira the Head of NFL Officials is the guy they talk to each week for those that don't have NFL Network (I love that segment). A few questionable/controversial plays from the previous week are tossed at him and he explains how/why the call was made. He isn't above saying "we missed that one" although not often.</p><p></p><p>Basically the Gado play was ruled an "Intentional Forward Fumble" from behind the LOS which by rule is a "legal forward pass." Thus Gado becomes a passer and is consequently protected by all rules that would protect a QB. Once that determination was made the officials determined that Yes, he was out of the pocket. As long as the "pass" get to the LOS it becomes nothing more than an incomplete pass and not intentional grounding.</p><p></p><p></p><p>They didn't discuss any holding penalty (or lack thereof). He said "Gado figured it out, or lucked out. But he beat the rule" He said that he doesn't believe that this result is the intent of the rule but they would have to look at that during the off season.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackinSteel, post: 35113, member: 415"] Alright, Mike Pereira the Head of NFL Officials is the guy they talk to each week for those that don't have NFL Network (I love that segment). A few questionable/controversial plays from the previous week are tossed at him and he explains how/why the call was made. He isn't above saying "we missed that one" although not often. Basically the Gado play was ruled an "Intentional Forward Fumble" from behind the LOS which by rule is a "legal forward pass." Thus Gado becomes a passer and is consequently protected by all rules that would protect a QB. Once that determination was made the officials determined that Yes, he was out of the pocket. As long as the "pass" get to the LOS it becomes nothing more than an incomplete pass and not intentional grounding. They didn't discuss any holding penalty (or lack thereof). He said "Gado figured it out, or lucked out. But he beat the rule" He said that he doesn't believe that this result is the intent of the rule but they would have to look at that during the off season. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
Latest posts
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: Voyageur
36 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 2:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 11:59 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 11:47 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 9:02 AM
College Sports
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers should have lost
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top