Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2016 Draft Archive
Packers Pick #2 - Jason Spriggs Indiana OT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreenBaySlacker" data-source="post: 663960" data-attributes="member: 9780"><p>I also said we should add two extra ots and call them te. That isnt realistic taking it to the extreme... Maybe for the real short yardage situations??? Realistically, Im still talking about incorporating one into a major part of the offense. People concentrate on what we lose by having a 6th olineman(te). Namely a skill player... Not completely i argue, in that a big strong te will always be a decent target for dump offs. But do they fully consider what we gain? Years of trouble trying to protect Rodgers..... Years of trouble getting 1 yard on 3rd and short..... Years!!!! And frickin years!</p><p></p><p>To take it a step farther. I see the idea as a future trend in the pass first nfl. Back in the day most every team had 4 dlinemen against 5 olinemenNow with hybrid 4-3s and 3-4s sending guys in from every direction. Oline becoming more valuable. I think it makes a lot of sense to take away a speed guy to insure better offense as a whole...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreenBaySlacker, post: 663960, member: 9780"] I also said we should add two extra ots and call them te. That isnt realistic taking it to the extreme... Maybe for the real short yardage situations??? Realistically, Im still talking about incorporating one into a major part of the offense. People concentrate on what we lose by having a 6th olineman(te). Namely a skill player... Not completely i argue, in that a big strong te will always be a decent target for dump offs. But do they fully consider what we gain? Years of trouble trying to protect Rodgers..... Years of trouble getting 1 yard on 3rd and short..... Years!!!! And frickin years! To take it a step farther. I see the idea as a future trend in the pass first nfl. Back in the day most every team had 4 dlinemen against 5 olinemenNow with hybrid 4-3s and 3-4s sending guys in from every direction. Oline becoming more valuable. I think it makes a lot of sense to take away a speed guy to insure better offense as a whole... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Heyjoe4
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
Update on Watson's Hamstrngs
Latest: Voyageur
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OTAs
Latest: OldSchool101
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Shareholders meeting 2024?
Latest: weeds
Today at 5:35 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 8:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 2:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2016 Draft Archive
Packers Pick #2 - Jason Spriggs Indiana OT
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top