Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Overall draft thoughts 2023
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 998760" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Problem is that had zero to do with my post here it is below.</p><p></p><p></p><p><u>“Many players had minimal production in College <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"><span style="font-size: 18px"><strong>compared to peers in the same draft area” </strong></span></span></u></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>1. Will Anderson (#3)</strong></p><p>41 games</p><p>204 Tackles</p><p>58.5 TFL</p><p>34.5 Sacks</p><p><strong>2. Tyree Wilson (#7)</strong></p><p>35 games</p><p>121 Tackles</p><p>32.0 TFL</p><p>17.0 Sacks</p><p><strong>3. Lukas Van Ness (#13)</strong></p><p>26 games</p><p>70 Tackles</p><p>19.0 TFL</p><p>13.0 Sacks</p><p><strong>4. Myles Murphy (#28)</strong></p><p>35 games</p><p>116 Tackles</p><p>36.0 Loss</p><p>18.5 Sacks</p><p><strong>5. Nolan Smith (#31)</strong></p><p>38 games</p><p>110 Tackles</p><p>20.00 TFL</p><p>12.5 Sacks</p><p></p><p>A professor asks you to turn in your test and choose the Least Producing player in Round 1. No other information or elaborate explanations will be accepted. Your 2 answers will count Double towards your final grade.</p><p></p><p>1. Which player has the least College production among their NFL draft peers.</p><p>Also</p><p>2. Which player in general played the least amount of ball among their NFL draft peers.</p><p></p><p>I love his selection. I think his potential is outstanding. Im glad we got him. It looks to me like in more limited tries (peer comparisons shown) he’s done a fantastic job.</p><p></p><p>That said he’s 100% more projection than any of his peers and that was exactly what I said above in bold.</p><p>The Packers didn’t need to go after purely Rookie production. They want the player with the best long term output and they could afford to wait a season or two to get that high production if needed. That’s what this draft was all about and it’s not an insult. It’s what many in the media are not grasping (somethings not clicking) about this draft, this is a Part 1 Part 2 <em>To be Continued Draft </em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 998760, member: 10086"] Problem is that had zero to do with my post here it is below. [U]“Many players had minimal production in College [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)][SIZE=5][B]compared to peers in the same draft area” [/B][/SIZE][/COLOR][/U] [B]1. Will Anderson (#3)[/B] 41 games 204 Tackles 58.5 TFL 34.5 Sacks [B]2. Tyree Wilson (#7)[/B] 35 games 121 Tackles 32.0 TFL 17.0 Sacks [B]3. Lukas Van Ness (#13)[/B] 26 games 70 Tackles 19.0 TFL 13.0 Sacks [B]4. Myles Murphy (#28)[/B] 35 games 116 Tackles 36.0 Loss 18.5 Sacks [B]5. Nolan Smith (#31)[/B] 38 games 110 Tackles 20.00 TFL 12.5 Sacks A professor asks you to turn in your test and choose the Least Producing player in Round 1. No other information or elaborate explanations will be accepted. Your 2 answers will count Double towards your final grade. 1. Which player has the least College production among their NFL draft peers. Also 2. Which player in general played the least amount of ball among their NFL draft peers. I love his selection. I think his potential is outstanding. Im glad we got him. It looks to me like in more limited tries (peer comparisons shown) he’s done a fantastic job. That said he’s 100% more projection than any of his peers and that was exactly what I said above in bold. The Packers didn’t need to go after purely Rookie production. They want the player with the best long term output and they could afford to wait a season or two to get that high production if needed. That’s what this draft was all about and it’s not an insult. It’s what many in the media are not grasping (somethings not clicking) about this draft, this is a Part 1 Part 2 [I]To be Continued Draft [/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
sschind
jetfixer
Latest posts
S
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: sschind
6 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: jetfixer
12 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Who Will Start?
Latest: gopkrs
39 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Packers Hire New Defensive Coordinator: Jeff Hafley, formerly Head Coach, Boston College
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 8:54 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 6:32 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Overall draft thoughts 2023
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top