Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Our defense now...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 444863" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">The potential improvement for the defense is stark after just two UFA signings and this draft. Of course obvious optimism surrounds teaming Matthews with Perry to upgrade the pressure from the outside. Perhaps Terrell Manning or Vic So'oto or another returning OLB can spell them but the OLB backups will probably have to contribute on STs in order to be active on game days. Just as important is pressure inside so the QB can't step up in the pocket. Newcomers Jerel Worthy, Anthony Hargrove, and Mike Daniels are likely to join (a much more rested) BJ Raji in an inside rotation in the nickel. That's four players for the two-man DL rotation in the nickel and that's four newcomers to contribute to the pass rush from the front 6 in Capers' most-used alignment.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">I hope Muir provides insurance for Pickett - he's four years younger but not as "stout". And he may be able to spell Raji some on base downs. IMO the backups at ILB outplayed Hawk last year and with Terrell Manning being added to that group, if the starters don't step up their play, the staff definitely has options. As we all know, improved play from one spot or one unit often has a positive effect on the rest of the defense. So even if it's Bishop and Hawk again at ILB, I think we can expect improved pressure from ILB because offenses will have to be paying much more attention to the OLB and the D linemen. The improved symbiotic relationship among the front 6-7 should also improve the production of DBs blitzing. For example, compare how successful Woodson was blitzing in 2010 vs. last season. And of course Woodson isn't the only DB who blitzes.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">What should be a dramatic increase in pressure would help the secondary even if they played the same as they did last season. <em>But they better not</em>. IMO the entire secondary has to improve regardless of what should be a significantly better pass rush. I hope the additions of Casey Hayward and Jerron McMillian and/or the improvement of Davon House or MD Jennings mean Charlie Peprah's days starting are over (Woodson could start at safety if Jennings or McMillian aren't up to it). And no offense meant to Charlie who was good enough in 2010, but if he doesn't survive the final roster cuts that would be a good indication of improvement of the personnel in the secondary. I'm not expecting that, though. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Even though IMO their play has to improve Williams, Woodson, Burnett, and Shields are sure things in the secondary. Beyond them, who will step up to start opposite Burnett at safety? Will Hayward or House force their way onto the field in the nickel? Will the staff trust MD Jennings enough to start at safety? How good is McMillian and will he be able to contribute from scrimmage in his rookie year? There are questions in the secondary but IMO if Peprah's spot can be upgraded and the returning starters upgrade their play, we should see a dramatic improvement in the defense. And if they can't find another starter at safety, perhaps Capers next innovation in the nickel will be to start 4 CBs and one safety. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">As for statistical expectations for 2012, the Packers D finished the 2011 regular season 19th in scoring giving up 22.4 ppg. The Steelers led the league surrendering 14.2 ppg and the median was the Cowboys at 21.7 ppg. The Packers were 21st in TDs surrendered at 41 but were tied for 27th in passing TDs surrendered with 29. An often ignored stat: The Packers defense led the league with 31 INTs (next closest was 23!) and was tied for overall turnovers secured with the 49ers at 38. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">The year before the Packers D was second in the league in points allowed at 15 ppg and second in INTs with 24. I don't expect that big an improvement in ppg but I do expect the 2012 defense to be much closer to 15 ppg than 22.4 ppg. At the same time even with the improved pass rush I expect fewer than 31 INTs because an average of nearly 2 INTs per game is just crazy. </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 444863, member: 4300"] [FONT=Tahoma]The potential improvement for the defense is stark after just two UFA signings and this draft. Of course obvious optimism surrounds teaming Matthews with Perry to upgrade the pressure from the outside. Perhaps Terrell Manning or Vic So'oto or another returning OLB can spell them but the OLB backups will probably have to contribute on STs in order to be active on game days. Just as important is pressure inside so the QB can't step up in the pocket. Newcomers Jerel Worthy, Anthony Hargrove, and Mike Daniels are likely to join (a much more rested) BJ Raji in an inside rotation in the nickel. That's four players for the two-man DL rotation in the nickel and that's four newcomers to contribute to the pass rush from the front 6 in Capers' most-used alignment.[/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]I hope Muir provides insurance for Pickett - he's four years younger but not as "stout". And he may be able to spell Raji some on base downs. IMO the backups at ILB outplayed Hawk last year and with Terrell Manning being added to that group, if the starters don't step up their play, the staff definitely has options. As we all know, improved play from one spot or one unit often has a positive effect on the rest of the defense. So even if it's Bishop and Hawk again at ILB, I think we can expect improved pressure from ILB because offenses will have to be paying much more attention to the OLB and the D linemen. The improved symbiotic relationship among the front 6-7 should also improve the production of DBs blitzing. For example, compare how successful Woodson was blitzing in 2010 vs. last season. And of course Woodson isn't the only DB who blitzes.[/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]What should be a dramatic increase in pressure would help the secondary even if they played the same as they did last season. [I]But they better not[/I]. IMO the entire secondary has to improve regardless of what should be a significantly better pass rush. I hope the additions of Casey Hayward and Jerron McMillian and/or the improvement of Davon House or MD Jennings mean Charlie Peprah's days starting are over (Woodson could start at safety if Jennings or McMillian aren't up to it). And no offense meant to Charlie who was good enough in 2010, but if he doesn't survive the final roster cuts that would be a good indication of improvement of the personnel in the secondary. I'm not expecting that, though. [/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]Even though IMO their play has to improve Williams, Woodson, Burnett, and Shields are sure things in the secondary. Beyond them, who will step up to start opposite Burnett at safety? Will Hayward or House force their way onto the field in the nickel? Will the staff trust MD Jennings enough to start at safety? How good is McMillian and will he be able to contribute from scrimmage in his rookie year? There are questions in the secondary but IMO if Peprah's spot can be upgraded and the returning starters upgrade their play, we should see a dramatic improvement in the defense. And if they can't find another starter at safety, perhaps Capers next innovation in the nickel will be to start 4 CBs and one safety. [/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]As for statistical expectations for 2012, the Packers D finished the 2011 regular season 19th in scoring giving up 22.4 ppg. The Steelers led the league surrendering 14.2 ppg and the median was the Cowboys at 21.7 ppg. The Packers were 21st in TDs surrendered at 41 but were tied for 27th in passing TDs surrendered with 29. An often ignored stat: The Packers defense led the league with 31 INTs (next closest was 23!) and was tied for overall turnovers secured with the 49ers at 38. [/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]The year before the Packers D was second in the league in points allowed at 15 ppg and second in INTs with 24. I don't expect that big an improvement in ppg but I do expect the 2012 defense to be much closer to 15 ppg than 22.4 ppg. At the same time even with the improved pass rush I expect fewer than 31 INTs because an average of nearly 2 INTs per game is just crazy. [/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 8:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: milani
Today at 7:52 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: AmishMafia
Today at 6:36 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: DoURant
Today at 5:53 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 4:58 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Our defense now...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top