Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
onlymeiknow trolling attemps
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wizard 87" data-source="post: 447106" data-attributes="member: 1244"><p>I will explain it for you since you can't grasp the comment. If they retire or don't retire a number it means very little in terms of a players legacy.</p><p>Willie Davis #87 great packer <span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'arial'"><span style="color: #222222"> is the only person to possess all four of the </span></span></span><em><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'arial'"><span style="color: #000000"><strong>Green Bay Packers</strong></span></span></span></em><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'arial'"><span style="color: #222222">' Super Bowl rings. Yet his number was NOT retired. Does that tarnish his legacy ??? ( </span></span></span><a href="http://www.packers.com/news-and-events/article_spofford/article-1/One-man-has-all-four-rings/fdeae1be-3d3e-4ffb-87f7-1ec70f4a7c10" target="_blank">http://www.packers.com/news-and-events/article_spofford/article-1/One-man-has-all-four-rings/fdeae1be-3d3e-4ffb-87f7-1ec70f4a7c10</a> )</p><p> </p><p>So the retire the number argument is rather pointless because if you have to retire a number in order to have a great legacy then you don't have much of one do you. It's passe in that there was a huge thread on this very board for 2 years arguing the same points that led to..... nowhere.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wizard 87, post: 447106, member: 1244"] I will explain it for you since you can't grasp the comment. If they retire or don't retire a number it means very little in terms of a players legacy. Willie Davis #87 great packer [SIZE=3][FONT=arial][COLOR=#222222] is the only person to possess all four of the [/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE][I][SIZE=3][FONT=arial][COLOR=#000000][B]Green Bay Packers[/B][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE][/I][SIZE=3][FONT=arial][COLOR=#222222]' Super Bowl rings. Yet his number was NOT retired. Does that tarnish his legacy ??? ( [/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE][url]http://www.packers.com/news-and-events/article_spofford/article-1/One-man-has-all-four-rings/fdeae1be-3d3e-4ffb-87f7-1ec70f4a7c10[/url] ) So the retire the number argument is rather pointless because if you have to retire a number in order to have a great legacy then you don't have much of one do you. It's passe in that there was a huge thread on this very board for 2 years arguing the same points that led to..... nowhere. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
thequick12
RicFlairoftheNFL
sschind
kf323
DoURant
mradtke66
Latest posts
2024 Round 4, pick 111: Evan Williams, S, Oregon
Latest: Dantés
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
6 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
12 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: OldSchool101
13 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Dantés
15 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
onlymeiknow trolling attemps
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top