Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Offensive play calling
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 550782" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p>You were and are free to discuss, in depth, whatever you would like relating to Packers football here. But when you ask a question and then refuse to “hear” an answer, particularly what is (IMO) the obvious answer, you should expect some negative feedback. For example, look at post #43. Carl posts, “I’ll answer your concerns using only things that have already been posted…” And he then proceeds to do so. Your reply: “This is good, I was hoping for more information like this.” <em>That was information already posted!</em></p><p></p><p>In that same post you responded to two more previous posts quoted by Carl by writing, “Another comment that started to get into what I was hoping to discuss (however the topic kept getting derailed by the "spread the defense" crowd).” You apparently didn’t read carefully enough to realize the first post quoted was made by me, in post #15 of this thread and the next one was from the second post in this thread by El Guapo. So according to your post, I was providing comments that you were hoping to discuss and also derailing the thread.</p><p></p><p>In that same post you say that the statement “It's easier to run the ball when the defense has fewer defenders in the box.", is “patently false” because some teams run the ball very well out of sets featuring fewer than 3 WRs. So I guess you mean some teams run better against defenses with more defenders in the box. IOW, a team in a 2 TE set would prefer more defenders anticipating the run than fewer. No, <em>that</em> is what is patently false. No matter the formation of the offense, it's easier to run the ball when the defense has fewer defenders in the box.</p><p></p><p>As I said, it looks like you weren’t interested in the answers to the question you posed since some had to be posted twice before you read and responded to them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 550782, member: 4300"] You were and are free to discuss, in depth, whatever you would like relating to Packers football here. But when you ask a question and then refuse to “hear” an answer, particularly what is (IMO) the obvious answer, you should expect some negative feedback. For example, look at post #43. Carl posts, “I’ll answer your concerns using only things that have already been posted…” And he then proceeds to do so. Your reply: “This is good, I was hoping for more information like this.” [I]That was information already posted![/I] In that same post you responded to two more previous posts quoted by Carl by writing, “Another comment that started to get into what I was hoping to discuss (however the topic kept getting derailed by the "spread the defense" crowd).” You apparently didn’t read carefully enough to realize the first post quoted was made by me, in post #15 of this thread and the next one was from the second post in this thread by El Guapo. So according to your post, I was providing comments that you were hoping to discuss and also derailing the thread. In that same post you say that the statement “It's easier to run the ball when the defense has fewer defenders in the box.", is “patently false” because some teams run the ball very well out of sets featuring fewer than 3 WRs. So I guess you mean some teams run better against defenses with more defenders in the box. IOW, a team in a 2 TE set would prefer more defenders anticipating the run than fewer. No, [I]that[/I] is what is patently false. No matter the formation of the offense, it's easier to run the ball when the defense has fewer defenders in the box. As I said, it looks like you weren’t interested in the answers to the question you posed since some had to be posted twice before you read and responded to them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
Schultz
Krabs
mradtke66
PikeBadger
Dukefan12
PackerDNA
RepStar15
Latest posts
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
2 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: PikeBadger
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: PikeBadger
6 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: PikeBadger
39 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:04 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Offensive play calling
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top