Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NEVER GONNA HAPPEN, BUT I WISH .....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="texaspackerbacker" data-source="post: 498780" data-attributes="member: 25"><p>I would really like to see the Packers go back to the old Flanker T formation - Split Backs instead of the I Formation. I mean the Taylor/Hornung thing, the Grabowski/Anderson thing, Csonka/Kiick, etc. I guess the justification for the I is having basically a non-runner FB to lead block, but it's my contention that most RBs could do the job. Also, split backs should open up a wider variety of outside running plays. Also, logically having two RBs should better serve to pass block free rushers and/or provide outlet receivers. Who can better block an outside pass rusher, a FB in the I or an RB offset to the side of the pass rush? And who would you rather see catch a safety valve pass, Kuhn or Lacy/Franklin/Harris?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="texaspackerbacker, post: 498780, member: 25"] I would really like to see the Packers go back to the old Flanker T formation - Split Backs instead of the I Formation. I mean the Taylor/Hornung thing, the Grabowski/Anderson thing, Csonka/Kiick, etc. I guess the justification for the I is having basically a non-runner FB to lead block, but it's my contention that most RBs could do the job. Also, split backs should open up a wider variety of outside running plays. Also, logically having two RBs should better serve to pass block free rushers and/or provide outlet receivers. Who can better block an outside pass rusher, a FB in the I or an RB offset to the side of the pass rush? And who would you rather see catch a safety valve pass, Kuhn or Lacy/Franklin/Harris? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Who Will Start?
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 9:54 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
G
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Yesterday at 9:16 PM
Draft Talk
Moving Up
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 8:29 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Time to call Brett back from the woodshed....
Latest: longtimefan
Yesterday at 8:25 PM
Brett Favre Discussion
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NEVER GONNA HAPPEN, BUT I WISH .....
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top