Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
My Time Machine
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IPBprez" data-source="post: 23213" data-attributes="member: 51"><p>Actually, there are quite a few out there who are smelling the roses on this thought.... Despite what DePack has to say about it. </p><p></p><p>The Packers couldn't beat Romeo Crennel's defensive plan... Mostly because Tom Rossley couldn't win a regular checkers game. Slicing the middle on our Defensive Scheme was two blunders I think Jim Bates will certainly correct.. One of our two Safeties were off the box on those two plays... They were drawin' us the set somehow and only film review will tell the tale....</p><p></p><p>I still say Rossley needs to come down to the field for the rest of the Season. Maybe he'll get a spine with some trick play calling along the way.... Otherwise? Yooper's right.... and like Czabe said this morning... "Brett came back for this...?" Scott Linn, Czabe's sidekick, made mention of next week's Tampa Bay game and immediately called the Packer's 0-3... which I've already posted elsewhere....</p><p></p><p>NO COACH should have to have four regular Season games to figure this "not-rocket-science" stuff out.... Ya notice Lovie Smith's Team gets it... more like the Coaching Staff is all on the same page... and as I predicted back during the Draft.. Kyle Orton would end up proving to be a good NFL QB... Shame Mike SHerman was more interested in ratings at that time than he was in reviewing performances and what part of the College program any Player might come from... Orton's gonna end up being real deal in Chicago.</p><p></p><p>Sherman needs to lock himself up in his Office and take the phone off the hook, shut out Rossley from the original game planning, and get it right.. just like Detroit last year... Heck, I even saw Sherman swinging his hands upstairs at the booth over one play, which should have had a red flag thrown at it, but apparently, Rossley wasn't prepped for a response... at least, not in time for it to matter... must have been the food on the desk infront of the buttons on the video review machine...</p><p></p><p>Aaaah well, there's always the next game.. right? We can always try something else next game.. and the next and the next and the next.. whatever!</p><p></p><p>At least I had the Nineties to see some Packer greatness...</p><p>Ya see, it's all about just me, too...... :roll:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IPBprez, post: 23213, member: 51"] Actually, there are quite a few out there who are smelling the roses on this thought.... Despite what DePack has to say about it. The Packers couldn't beat Romeo Crennel's defensive plan... Mostly because Tom Rossley couldn't win a regular checkers game. Slicing the middle on our Defensive Scheme was two blunders I think Jim Bates will certainly correct.. One of our two Safeties were off the box on those two plays... They were drawin' us the set somehow and only film review will tell the tale.... I still say Rossley needs to come down to the field for the rest of the Season. Maybe he'll get a spine with some trick play calling along the way.... Otherwise? Yooper's right.... and like Czabe said this morning... "Brett came back for this...?" Scott Linn, Czabe's sidekick, made mention of next week's Tampa Bay game and immediately called the Packer's 0-3... which I've already posted elsewhere.... NO COACH should have to have four regular Season games to figure this "not-rocket-science" stuff out.... Ya notice Lovie Smith's Team gets it... more like the Coaching Staff is all on the same page... and as I predicted back during the Draft.. Kyle Orton would end up proving to be a good NFL QB... Shame Mike SHerman was more interested in ratings at that time than he was in reviewing performances and what part of the College program any Player might come from... Orton's gonna end up being real deal in Chicago. Sherman needs to lock himself up in his Office and take the phone off the hook, shut out Rossley from the original game planning, and get it right.. just like Detroit last year... Heck, I even saw Sherman swinging his hands upstairs at the booth over one play, which should have had a red flag thrown at it, but apparently, Rossley wasn't prepped for a response... at least, not in time for it to matter... must have been the food on the desk infront of the buttons on the video review machine... Aaaah well, there's always the next game.. right? We can always try something else next game.. and the next and the next and the next.. whatever! At least I had the Nineties to see some Packer greatness... Ya see, it's all about just me, too...... :roll: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Packermudgeon
El Guapo
ExpatPacker
Sunshinepacker
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
Enagbare injury update
Latest: El Guapo
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: El Guapo
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
43 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 11:06 AM
Draft Talk
R
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Today at 10:52 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
My Time Machine
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top