Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Minnesota Vikings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Clay's Jock Strap" data-source="post: 268961" data-attributes="member: 1977"><p>keep spinning viking troll. You have nothing. No championships... Zero, zilch, nada... You want to play a game of semantics rather than to interpret something in the spirit in which it was meant to be interpreted. It is all you have. You know exactly what I meant about the Packers' titles yet you want to divert the discussion to semantical ******** because it is all that you have. Spin spin spin little lost viqueen fan in Packer land. </p><p></p><p></p><p>The Packers don't boast 12 "Super Bowl" championships or 12 NFL championships, they boast 12 WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS - meaning that they were the undisputed WORLD CHAMPIONS in 1929, 1930, 1931, 1936, 1939, 1944, 1961, 1962, 1965, 1966, 1967 and 1996. For the slooooooow out there, that means that nobody disputes that they were the best team in the WORLD in their sport in those years. No team in any country anywhere in the world would dare claim they were better that year. Now, if you want to argue diluted championships like who won a division, have at it. You were the best team among 4 in a division when there were many other teams at the same level that accomplished the same thing... Those teams then must meet at the end of seasons to determine which was the best. You didn't hear the USFL squaking in the '80s that they didn't get a crack at the Super Bowl Champ any more than you didn't hear the same out of the AFL when they were inferior. Until the NFL started playing the AFL in a championship game, nobody doubted who would have won. The AFL wasn't ready for prime time. </p><p></p><p>You can keep clinging to your semantical argument that the queens won the "NFL" in 1969... Big f'n deal. They weren't WORLD CHAMPIONS - that was the Kansas City Chiefs who - AGAIN - beat down your purple heros to the tune of 23-7. </p><p></p><p>"NFL" titles, NFC titles, NFC Central titles, NFC North titles... Keep floating those banners in your crapdome... The Packers only care about WORLD titles - our goals seem to be just a bit loftier than your teams'. Of course, when you have never won a WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP, I guess you just gotta get yours wherever you can... Spin the truth and then hope someone buys it and thinks you are better than you really were...</p><p>:viksux:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Clay's Jock Strap, post: 268961, member: 1977"] keep spinning viking troll. You have nothing. No championships... Zero, zilch, nada... You want to play a game of semantics rather than to interpret something in the spirit in which it was meant to be interpreted. It is all you have. You know exactly what I meant about the Packers' titles yet you want to divert the discussion to semantical ******** because it is all that you have. Spin spin spin little lost viqueen fan in Packer land. The Packers don't boast 12 "Super Bowl" championships or 12 NFL championships, they boast 12 WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS - meaning that they were the undisputed WORLD CHAMPIONS in 1929, 1930, 1931, 1936, 1939, 1944, 1961, 1962, 1965, 1966, 1967 and 1996. For the slooooooow out there, that means that nobody disputes that they were the best team in the WORLD in their sport in those years. No team in any country anywhere in the world would dare claim they were better that year. Now, if you want to argue diluted championships like who won a division, have at it. You were the best team among 4 in a division when there were many other teams at the same level that accomplished the same thing... Those teams then must meet at the end of seasons to determine which was the best. You didn't hear the USFL squaking in the '80s that they didn't get a crack at the Super Bowl Champ any more than you didn't hear the same out of the AFL when they were inferior. Until the NFL started playing the AFL in a championship game, nobody doubted who would have won. The AFL wasn't ready for prime time. You can keep clinging to your semantical argument that the queens won the "NFL" in 1969... Big f'n deal. They weren't WORLD CHAMPIONS - that was the Kansas City Chiefs who - AGAIN - beat down your purple heros to the tune of 23-7. "NFL" titles, NFC titles, NFC Central titles, NFC North titles... Keep floating those banners in your crapdome... The Packers only care about WORLD titles - our goals seem to be just a bit loftier than your teams'. Of course, when you have never won a WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP, I guess you just gotta get yours wherever you can... Spin the truth and then hope someone buys it and thinks you are better than you really were... :viksux: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
Latest posts
G
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: GleefulGary
Today at 3:30 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 3:00 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 2:51 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: rmontro
Today at 2:03 AM
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:51 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Minnesota Vikings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top