Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
MINICAMP WATCH
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="packedhouse01" data-source="post: 152389" data-attributes="member: 204"><p>The one thing that I know is that the chemistry of a team is vital to wining. Teams who have good chemistry win. Teams who are building but don't yet have great talent can win with good chemistry. Teams who don't have it don't win. Look at what is happening in Cincinnati. So as I sit back and read all these comments on the first mini camp I'm impressed that everyone showed up that as supposed to be there. I like how McCarthy put his foot down because I think your boss has to have control of his team. </p><p></p><p>The OTA's concern me however. I know they are supposedly voluntary. When you have veterans who have already spoken up and said, "I'm not coming to any of those", I think that can lead to bad chemistry and I think it sets a tone for the young players to do the same thing as they become established in this league. That can lead to bad chemistry. And truthfully, that concerns me. I'm not sure what can be done about those OTA's, but I wonder if they're voluntary if they are then necessary? Does the absence of star veterans offset the good that can be done in the hope of blending the young and veteran talent?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="packedhouse01, post: 152389, member: 204"] The one thing that I know is that the chemistry of a team is vital to wining. Teams who have good chemistry win. Teams who are building but don't yet have great talent can win with good chemistry. Teams who don't have it don't win. Look at what is happening in Cincinnati. So as I sit back and read all these comments on the first mini camp I'm impressed that everyone showed up that as supposed to be there. I like how McCarthy put his foot down because I think your boss has to have control of his team. The OTA's concern me however. I know they are supposedly voluntary. When you have veterans who have already spoken up and said, "I'm not coming to any of those", I think that can lead to bad chemistry and I think it sets a tone for the young players to do the same thing as they become established in this league. That can lead to bad chemistry. And truthfully, that concerns me. I'm not sure what can be done about those OTA's, but I wonder if they're voluntary if they are then necessary? Does the absence of star veterans offset the good that can be done in the hope of blending the young and veteran talent? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:58 AM
Draft Talk
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 10:55 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Yesterday at 10:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
MINICAMP WATCH
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top