Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Latest Mock...this is far too good to occur
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 827896" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>Your original point was that the Packers shouldn't spend a high pick on a TE, that it would be better to spend late round picks on the position, let them develop and win a starting spot. When I pointed out that this was a failed method for TT so he (and Gute) thus turned to trying to land a quality TE via Free Agency, your rebuttal was that this didn't work out and a TE can't solidify an offense.</p><p></p><p>Now you are saying dominant defenses win, so more effort needs to be put on the defense. Have you followed the last 7 or so Packer drafts? How has using most of our high draft capital on the defense panned out?</p><p></p><p>I get that you like Devin White, since your posts started with this:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>BTW.....our #12 along with #118 and #226 wouldn't be nearly enough firepower to move up to #7, at best, #10 and I even doubt that.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I would be fine with White at #12 or Hochenson, I think either has a chance to make an impact with the team to warrant the pick, but no way do I trade up to #7, which would probably take our #12 and #44, to pick either player.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 827896, member: 7261"] Your original point was that the Packers shouldn't spend a high pick on a TE, that it would be better to spend late round picks on the position, let them develop and win a starting spot. When I pointed out that this was a failed method for TT so he (and Gute) thus turned to trying to land a quality TE via Free Agency, your rebuttal was that this didn't work out and a TE can't solidify an offense. Now you are saying dominant defenses win, so more effort needs to be put on the defense. Have you followed the last 7 or so Packer drafts? How has using most of our high draft capital on the defense panned out? I get that you like Devin White, since your posts started with this: BTW.....our #12 along with #118 and #226 wouldn't be nearly enough firepower to move up to #7, at best, #10 and I even doubt that. Anyway, I would be fine with White at #12 or Hochenson, I think either has a chance to make an impact with the team to warrant the pick, but no way do I trade up to #7, which would probably take our #12 and #44, to pick either player. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Jontycaster
Latest posts
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 3:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 3:52 PM
College Sports
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 3:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Official Schedule For 2024
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 1:51 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 12:32 PM
All Other Sports
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Latest Mock...this is far too good to occur
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top