Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Julius Thomas for Randall Cobb?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 599817" data-attributes="member: 9033"><p>The concern over re-signing Bulaga is a little overblown. Rodgers is a great QB. Great QBs don't need great olines. What was the last team that won a Super Bowl and also had an elite oline? That's an honest question, I can't recall.</p><p> </p><p>The Packers started Marshall Newhouse at LT for 13 games and went 15-1...that alone should tell you how "necessary" it is to have really good tackles.</p><p> </p><p>I want the Packers to re-sign Bulaga, it's nice to have a great oline. But it's not necessary. If the choice is signing Cobb or Bulaga, it's Cobb by a mile and not even close. Could someone please explain why Bulaga re-signing is so important? I mean, real actual facts. Not "we need to keep Rodgers healthy" because there are a LOT of ways the offense can compensate for having to help a right tackle (e.g., chipping, quick throws, etc) and I haven't yet seen any real evidence that shows right tackle performance is strongly linked to team performance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunshinepacker, post: 599817, member: 9033"] The concern over re-signing Bulaga is a little overblown. Rodgers is a great QB. Great QBs don't need great olines. What was the last team that won a Super Bowl and also had an elite oline? That's an honest question, I can't recall. The Packers started Marshall Newhouse at LT for 13 games and went 15-1...that alone should tell you how "necessary" it is to have really good tackles. I want the Packers to re-sign Bulaga, it's nice to have a great oline. But it's not necessary. If the choice is signing Cobb or Bulaga, it's Cobb by a mile and not even close. Could someone please explain why Bulaga re-signing is so important? I mean, real actual facts. Not "we need to keep Rodgers healthy" because there are a LOT of ways the offense can compensate for having to help a right tackle (e.g., chipping, quick throws, etc) and I haven't yet seen any real evidence that shows right tackle performance is strongly linked to team performance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Sunshinepacker
Yesterday at 7:23 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Update on Watson's Hamstrngs
Latest: Sunshinepacker
Yesterday at 7:16 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 5:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Shareholders meeting 2024?
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 3:25 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Julius Thomas for Randall Cobb?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top