Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Job Postings: Are the jobs really as easy as some would...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="musccy" data-source="post: 34411" data-attributes="member: 219"><p><strong>Re: Job Postings: Are the jobs really as easy as some would.</strong></p><p></p><p>P@ck66. You need to step out more and look at the big picture. You mention all these cities with great coaches, but you're using Sean Salisbury analysis...look at who's best now, when they fall, ignore them or rip them apart, then latch on to the next person, who, at the moment, is successful.</p><p></p><p>Belichek and Reid were your favorite candidates for coaches 2 months ago, you couldn't stop talking about them, yet in the post you just wrote, you never refer to them once as coaches you'd like to see.</p><p></p><p>You aruge that all of these coaches are "better than MS," and your justification for this is subjective, based on a weakness (or strength) that we know the team so well. DePack (from Delaware) mentioned that a lot of the east coast coaches (e.g. Reid) would have the exact same stuff said about them that we gripe about w/ MS, even months ago when they were winning. All of our "poor game decisions," "can't win in the playoffs," or "this was a stupid play call" critiques are, often, generic "insert name here" types of arguments.</p><p></p><p>Does MS have weaknesses? YES!!! But so does EVERYBODY, and often they are just as glaring as MS' weaknesses...we're just too focused on the Pack, and not involved enough w/ other teams to see the forest from the trees.</p><p></p><p>Even Bates, who has done a fantastic job has had weaknesses. He couldn't "make game time adjustments" to MN's running attack after halftime in both games, which, ultimately is what cost the Pack the game.</p><p></p><p>And this "MS would suck w/out Brett" argument is weak...It'd apply to ANYONE! Would the Packers have gone to the SBs w/out Brett?!? I doubt it, so does that make MH a crappy coach? No, it just says you need some talented players to win as a coach. </p><p></p><p>If you advocate for a coaching change, fine, so do a number of ppl, but don't assume that MS is THAT much worse than everyone, or that a new coach alone will mean the Pack will be 13-3 next year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="musccy, post: 34411, member: 219"] [b]Re: Job Postings: Are the jobs really as easy as some would.[/b] P@ck66. You need to step out more and look at the big picture. You mention all these cities with great coaches, but you're using Sean Salisbury analysis...look at who's best now, when they fall, ignore them or rip them apart, then latch on to the next person, who, at the moment, is successful. Belichek and Reid were your favorite candidates for coaches 2 months ago, you couldn't stop talking about them, yet in the post you just wrote, you never refer to them once as coaches you'd like to see. You aruge that all of these coaches are "better than MS," and your justification for this is subjective, based on a weakness (or strength) that we know the team so well. DePack (from Delaware) mentioned that a lot of the east coast coaches (e.g. Reid) would have the exact same stuff said about them that we gripe about w/ MS, even months ago when they were winning. All of our "poor game decisions," "can't win in the playoffs," or "this was a stupid play call" critiques are, often, generic "insert name here" types of arguments. Does MS have weaknesses? YES!!! But so does EVERYBODY, and often they are just as glaring as MS' weaknesses...we're just too focused on the Pack, and not involved enough w/ other teams to see the forest from the trees. Even Bates, who has done a fantastic job has had weaknesses. He couldn't "make game time adjustments" to MN's running attack after halftime in both games, which, ultimately is what cost the Pack the game. And this "MS would suck w/out Brett" argument is weak...It'd apply to ANYONE! Would the Packers have gone to the SBs w/out Brett?!? I doubt it, so does that make MH a crappy coach? No, it just says you need some talented players to win as a coach. If you advocate for a coaching change, fine, so do a number of ppl, but don't assume that MS is THAT much worse than everyone, or that a new coach alone will mean the Pack will be 13-3 next year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Krabs
mradtke66
gopkrs
sschind
Latest posts
S
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: sschind
14 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: jetfixer
20 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Who Will Start?
Latest: gopkrs
47 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Packers Hire New Defensive Coordinator: Jeff Hafley, formerly Head Coach, Boston College
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 8:54 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 6:32 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Job Postings: Are the jobs really as easy as some would...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top