Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
JC Tretter still has plenty to prove
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jordyruns" data-source="post: 565249" data-attributes="member: 3538"><p>It is fine to still be skeptical but your point here makes me lose a lot of respect for your argument. What this shows is that tretter, (even after a slow start most likely due to him not playing in a year and a half) he still is on the same basic level as all the other top linemen we have (bakh, bulaga). If his record being worse than lane taylors is one of your arguments then why not argue that Sherrod should be starting over bulaga? And hell why are people worried about barclay being on IR, based on his record he would not make it past the first set of cuts. What these records show me is that tretter is on the same basic level as all our other top lineman, the minute differences in record does not make your point, the records should be taken with a grain of salt .</p><p> </p><p>The argument you just used makes you look very defensive, and does not give your post any credit. If you want to be skeptical be skeptical that's fine you are justified in doing so based on the fact that tretter does not have any regular season, full game action under his belt. That in of itself is a major point of concern, although his performances lately, the only performances he can do during preseason, keep diminishing these worries, not eliminating mind you just diminishing. Just don't try and defend your point by manipulating evidence in your favor like you just did. Someone proved you wrong, just admit it and stop arguing, you're justified in still being worried but this particular point just happens to go against you, it does not prove you wrong.</p><p> </p><p>I understand your point is that tretter gets beat on the initial push, but that hasn't seemed to weaken our offense yet. Again its just preseason but seeing as it is tretters only time so far he can show off his skill set im taking his performances a little more serious than a seasoned veteran. I am waiting for his performance to negativly affect the offense before I criticize him.</p><p> </p><p>You can respond to this all you want just know that unlike you I have made my point and from here on out will not be responding.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jordyruns, post: 565249, member: 3538"] It is fine to still be skeptical but your point here makes me lose a lot of respect for your argument. What this shows is that tretter, (even after a slow start most likely due to him not playing in a year and a half) he still is on the same basic level as all the other top linemen we have (bakh, bulaga). If his record being worse than lane taylors is one of your arguments then why not argue that Sherrod should be starting over bulaga? And hell why are people worried about barclay being on IR, based on his record he would not make it past the first set of cuts. What these records show me is that tretter is on the same basic level as all our other top lineman, the minute differences in record does not make your point, the records should be taken with a grain of salt . The argument you just used makes you look very defensive, and does not give your post any credit. If you want to be skeptical be skeptical that's fine you are justified in doing so based on the fact that tretter does not have any regular season, full game action under his belt. That in of itself is a major point of concern, although his performances lately, the only performances he can do during preseason, keep diminishing these worries, not eliminating mind you just diminishing. Just don't try and defend your point by manipulating evidence in your favor like you just did. Someone proved you wrong, just admit it and stop arguing, you're justified in still being worried but this particular point just happens to go against you, it does not prove you wrong. I understand your point is that tretter gets beat on the initial push, but that hasn't seemed to weaken our offense yet. Again its just preseason but seeing as it is tretters only time so far he can show off his skill set im taking his performances a little more serious than a seasoned veteran. I am waiting for his performance to negativly affect the offense before I criticize him. You can respond to this all you want just know that unlike you I have made my point and from here on out will not be responding. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Team Ronny
Latest posts
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Team Ronny
12 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
29th pick.. Eric stokes db
Latest: Pkrjones
47 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
49 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Who Will Start?
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 8:39 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Time to call Brett back from the woodshed....
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 7:11 PM
Brett Favre Discussion
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
JC Tretter still has plenty to prove
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top