Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Injuries Comparison - 49ers vs. Packers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marvin49" data-source="post: 484188" data-attributes="member: 7068"><p>Who said I had no confidense in the backups? Larry Grant and Tavares Gooden are pretty damn good. The 49ers DID play without Willis for 4 games last year (Grant took his spot). All I said was that the 49ers (who depend on defense more than the Packers) depend on more from the LB position than the Packers do. That doesn't mean they can't win. I'm just saying that losing the starting LB on the 49ers is different than losing the starting LB in GB simply because the 49ers have to rely on that defense more than the Packers do.</p><p> </p><p>Is that too complicated?</p><p> </p><p>Equivalent Value? Thats tought to say when we are talking about different positions...but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say Vernon Davis. Two-Time Pro Bowl player, He plays OFFENSE however, and on THESE 49ers the most important guys on the field play DEFENSE. Losing Davis would hurt...no doubt, but not nearly as much as losing Willis.</p><p> </p><p>Its not that I wouldn't give ANYONE up or compare Bishop to anyone. 1) I just don't think defense on the whole is as important to the Packers winning formula as it is to SF, and 2) You have just picked 2 players that many in the league would tell you are the best players at their positions in the entire NFL (and as such, are a reason that D is as good as it is).</p><p> </p><p>Your posts are getting funny tho...its like we are about to go out back and get in a fight but I'm just too soft to do it. LOL. This ain't a rumble. This is just peeps on the internet disgussing which loss means more to their team. The Packers have lost WAY more players to injury. WAY more. I'm not even arguing that. I'm just saying you can't say that losing Bishop means exactly the same thing to the Packers as the Niners losing Willis.</p><p> </p><p>ROTFLMAO! "Soft".</p><p> </p><p>BTW, the Niners will be there if they have to play backups at every position and I'll be in the stands cheering them on regardless.</p><p> </p><p>PS: I call big fat BS on the Flynn talk. So Right now, if I were to say that losing Kaepernick and Rodgers is essentially the same thing, you would agree with that statement? If so, we can end this conversation right now because we are clearly speaking different languages.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marvin49, post: 484188, member: 7068"] Who said I had no confidense in the backups? Larry Grant and Tavares Gooden are pretty damn good. The 49ers DID play without Willis for 4 games last year (Grant took his spot). All I said was that the 49ers (who depend on defense more than the Packers) depend on more from the LB position than the Packers do. That doesn't mean they can't win. I'm just saying that losing the starting LB on the 49ers is different than losing the starting LB in GB simply because the 49ers have to rely on that defense more than the Packers do. Is that too complicated? Equivalent Value? Thats tought to say when we are talking about different positions...but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say Vernon Davis. Two-Time Pro Bowl player, He plays OFFENSE however, and on THESE 49ers the most important guys on the field play DEFENSE. Losing Davis would hurt...no doubt, but not nearly as much as losing Willis. Its not that I wouldn't give ANYONE up or compare Bishop to anyone. 1) I just don't think defense on the whole is as important to the Packers winning formula as it is to SF, and 2) You have just picked 2 players that many in the league would tell you are the best players at their positions in the entire NFL (and as such, are a reason that D is as good as it is). Your posts are getting funny tho...its like we are about to go out back and get in a fight but I'm just too soft to do it. LOL. This ain't a rumble. This is just peeps on the internet disgussing which loss means more to their team. The Packers have lost WAY more players to injury. WAY more. I'm not even arguing that. I'm just saying you can't say that losing Bishop means exactly the same thing to the Packers as the Niners losing Willis. ROTFLMAO! "Soft". BTW, the Niners will be there if they have to play backups at every position and I'll be in the stands cheering them on regardless. PS: I call big fat BS on the Flynn talk. So Right now, if I were to say that losing Kaepernick and Rodgers is essentially the same thing, you would agree with that statement? If so, we can end this conversation right now because we are clearly speaking different languages. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DABIGZ
gopkrs
Latest posts
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Thirteen Below
46 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: gopkrs
55 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 10:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 6, pick 202: Travis Glover, OT
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 10:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:35 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Injuries Comparison - 49ers vs. Packers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top