Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
improved defence
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 629538"><p>Well, if they've concluded they do in fact have the player they thought they'd have when they drafted him, they may be willing to take some early lumps to shorten the learning curve. I think we've seen the same with Randall, but we're gratified there have not been many lumps.</p><p></p><p>Camp, preseason, in-season practice...all very important. But there's no substitute for money game experience.</p><p></p><p>That Kelce play illustrates another point. It's difficult to assign responsibility in zone coverage from the outside. While Sky King, myself, PFF, or anybody else had a gun to their head (and PFF does have a self-imposed requirement) and had to make a judgment on that play, Kendricks is the obvious choice as the responsible party. What we don't know is whether the Vikes would have expected a safety to come up and fill that spot, or whether they would have wanted the LB who lined up over Kelce's face to stay with him instead of releasing him. I think you have to see a lot of games, and a developing pattern if there is one, to get a feel for what this play says about the player.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 629538"] Well, if they've concluded they do in fact have the player they thought they'd have when they drafted him, they may be willing to take some early lumps to shorten the learning curve. I think we've seen the same with Randall, but we're gratified there have not been many lumps. Camp, preseason, in-season practice...all very important. But there's no substitute for money game experience. That Kelce play illustrates another point. It's difficult to assign responsibility in zone coverage from the outside. While Sky King, myself, PFF, or anybody else had a gun to their head (and PFF does have a self-imposed requirement) and had to make a judgment on that play, Kendricks is the obvious choice as the responsible party. What we don't know is whether the Vikes would have expected a safety to come up and fill that spot, or whether they would have wanted the LB who lined up over Kelce's face to stay with him instead of releasing him. I think you have to see a lot of games, and a developing pattern if there is one, to get a feel for what this play says about the player. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 11:59 PM
All Other Sports
Free Agency Thread
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:25 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Aaron Hill !!!
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 7:59 PM
Draft Talk
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 6:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
improved defence
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top