Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I'm Worried About The Vikings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ivo610" data-source="post: 384727" data-attributes="member: 2128"><p>Im not arguing for Ben to be higher, Im arguing that Dan watshisname shouldnt be above him. Even more so on a list that weighs heavily on "clutch situations" and who contributes to the win. Big Ben is one of the most clutch QBs I have seen in the past 15 years.</p><p></p><p>ESPNs argument is that this formula will count more towards players who contribute more to wins. But if they dont win how can they be ranked ahead of a SB winning QB (please the trent dilfer comment just made me laugh, its like you can name 2 guys that were not good QBs but played on HISTORIC defenses try to put it in perspective instead of just shouting those two) of that year.</p><p></p><p>The difference in games also might count towards those sack numbers too. Just maybe. Does the formula weigh strength of schedule? Nope. Does it weigh O line? not that I know of.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ivo610, post: 384727, member: 2128"] Im not arguing for Ben to be higher, Im arguing that Dan watshisname shouldnt be above him. Even more so on a list that weighs heavily on "clutch situations" and who contributes to the win. Big Ben is one of the most clutch QBs I have seen in the past 15 years. ESPNs argument is that this formula will count more towards players who contribute more to wins. But if they dont win how can they be ranked ahead of a SB winning QB (please the trent dilfer comment just made me laugh, its like you can name 2 guys that were not good QBs but played on HISTORIC defenses try to put it in perspective instead of just shouting those two) of that year. The difference in games also might count towards those sack numbers too. Just maybe. Does the formula weigh strength of schedule? Nope. Does it weigh O line? not that I know of. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
gopkrs
rmontro
DABIGZ
Latest posts
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
A moment ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: gopkrs
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
11 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 10:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 6, pick 202: Travis Glover, OT
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 10:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I'm Worried About The Vikings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top