Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
How about a trade with the Bears?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PWT36" data-source="post: 16805" data-attributes="member: 170"><p>There will be no trade with the Bears. TJ Sullivan will be cut and any team can pick him up. agopackgo4 says quote:" would rather they trade Aaron Rodgers than Nall. I really like Nall. I dont understand why people put him down. Every time he has came in a game he has done good." unquote---- If the Packers would have assessed Craig Nall QB talents like agopackgo4, they would have never drafted Rodgers. Please come to Green Bay and watch the Packers at training camp. I don't think you would advocate what you posted. I would be happy if Craig Nall would progress to a point where he would be able to be a starting QB in the NFL. Unfoutunately The Packers haven't come to that conclusion yet, because at times, Craig Nall has not looked very good in practice sessions either this year or last year. In '04 he looked adequate in relief of Brett Favre during regular season games, but that was probably not enough to convince the Packers, he would be heir apparent to Brett Favre. Aaron Rodgers, for a rookie QB with this Packer Team has done nothing but impress The Packers and we "railbirds" out at Packer training camp sessions. Rodgers needs experience, and he will have a couple years to get it, during Farve's last two years at QB here in Green Bay. To me and any other Packer fan, it should make no difference if either Rodgers or Nall who becomes the Packer starting QB after Favre , as long as the one chosen has talent to get the job done!! Remember this is two year process, don't make a premature conclusion, as to who whether Rodgers or Nall, (or neither) will be the next GB QB after Favre. We can only hope, Packers have more sucess finding one, than Broncos, 49ers, Cowboys, Dolphins, Raiders, and the Bears who all have had problems finding the main man after their long time star QB retired.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PWT36, post: 16805, member: 170"] There will be no trade with the Bears. TJ Sullivan will be cut and any team can pick him up. agopackgo4 says quote:" would rather they trade Aaron Rodgers than Nall. I really like Nall. I dont understand why people put him down. Every time he has came in a game he has done good." unquote---- If the Packers would have assessed Craig Nall QB talents like agopackgo4, they would have never drafted Rodgers. Please come to Green Bay and watch the Packers at training camp. I don't think you would advocate what you posted. I would be happy if Craig Nall would progress to a point where he would be able to be a starting QB in the NFL. Unfoutunately The Packers haven't come to that conclusion yet, because at times, Craig Nall has not looked very good in practice sessions either this year or last year. In '04 he looked adequate in relief of Brett Favre during regular season games, but that was probably not enough to convince the Packers, he would be heir apparent to Brett Favre. Aaron Rodgers, for a rookie QB with this Packer Team has done nothing but impress The Packers and we "railbirds" out at Packer training camp sessions. Rodgers needs experience, and he will have a couple years to get it, during Farve's last two years at QB here in Green Bay. To me and any other Packer fan, it should make no difference if either Rodgers or Nall who becomes the Packer starting QB after Favre , as long as the one chosen has talent to get the job done!! Remember this is two year process, don't make a premature conclusion, as to who whether Rodgers or Nall, (or neither) will be the next GB QB after Favre. We can only hope, Packers have more sucess finding one, than Broncos, 49ers, Cowboys, Dolphins, Raiders, and the Bears who all have had problems finding the main man after their long time star QB retired. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Thirteen Below
37 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: gopkrs
46 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: Dantés
Today at 10:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 6, pick 202: Travis Glover, OT
Latest: Dantés
Today at 10:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 10:35 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
How about a trade with the Bears?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top