Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Eagles dream team?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DevilDon" data-source="post: 377831" data-attributes="member: 2057"><p>I agree that preseason records or scores don't mean squat. But can anybody tell me how your first string team sucking is not important?</p><p>We all know each team will look at alot of younger players. But early in the game you're trying to tune up your starters too. So if those guys blow it means alot more work than those who have a starting squad that is tight.</p><p>Second? what's this about a team looking good "on paper"? You mean having alot of high profile names?</p><p>I would also like to point out that if a Charles Woodson type talent were available in free agency and nobody else was willing to bid for him to play at his original position (just like happened to CWood) I'd bet TT would be all over that player.</p><p>I think TT WOULD take a free agent if they liked him enough and he was cheap enough. The Packers are so talented that the best free agents at each position are usually their own.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DevilDon, post: 377831, member: 2057"] I agree that preseason records or scores don't mean squat. But can anybody tell me how your first string team sucking is not important? We all know each team will look at alot of younger players. But early in the game you're trying to tune up your starters too. So if those guys blow it means alot more work than those who have a starting squad that is tight. Second? what's this about a team looking good "on paper"? You mean having alot of high profile names? I would also like to point out that if a Charles Woodson type talent were available in free agency and nobody else was willing to bid for him to play at his original position (just like happened to CWood) I'd bet TT would be all over that player. I think TT WOULD take a free agent if they liked him enough and he was cheap enough. The Packers are so talented that the best free agents at each position are usually their own. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Azpackfan4
Calebs Revenge
scheeler
Latest posts
H
Packers Hire New Defensive Coordinator: Jeff Hafley, formerly Head Coach, Boston College
Latest: Heyjoe4
40 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Heyjoe4
47 minutes ago
College Sports
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 11:02 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 9:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Who Will Start?
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 7:51 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Eagles dream team?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top