Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Draft evaluations--read then comment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="adambr2" data-source="post: 536994" data-attributes="member: 7277"><p>I would have to respectfully disagree with your rating criteria, then. Rodgers and Matthews great picks? Of course. Jordy very good? Most definitely. Rating Bulaga in the same tier as Jordy is where I start to differ greatly. No way has their impact been similar. Given that Bulaga has missed the last 2 seasons, he would have needed to be a Pro Bowl quality tackle before then to fall into that category, and he was average. </p><p></p><p>Hawk and Raji are not good picks relative to their draft slot. Part of the reason that our defense is so mediocre right now is because when we had our opportunities to pick in the top 10, we got mediocre players like Hawk and Raji.</p><p></p><p>I assume with Neal you meant Perry because Neal was a 2nd rounder and is already a free agent. Putting Sherrod in the TBD category is generous at best. I think at this point I'd give him no more than a 20% chance of turning into a productive NFL player and an 80% shot at being a bust. </p><p></p><p>We aren't drafting Hall of Fame talent 30% of the time in the first round. If we were, I'd be beyond thrilled.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="adambr2, post: 536994, member: 7277"] I would have to respectfully disagree with your rating criteria, then. Rodgers and Matthews great picks? Of course. Jordy very good? Most definitely. Rating Bulaga in the same tier as Jordy is where I start to differ greatly. No way has their impact been similar. Given that Bulaga has missed the last 2 seasons, he would have needed to be a Pro Bowl quality tackle before then to fall into that category, and he was average. Hawk and Raji are not good picks relative to their draft slot. Part of the reason that our defense is so mediocre right now is because when we had our opportunities to pick in the top 10, we got mediocre players like Hawk and Raji. I assume with Neal you meant Perry because Neal was a 2nd rounder and is already a free agent. Putting Sherrod in the TBD category is generous at best. I think at this point I'd give him no more than a 20% chance of turning into a productive NFL player and an 80% shot at being a bust. We aren't drafting Hall of Fame talent 30% of the time in the first round. If we were, I'd be beyond thrilled. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
El Guapo
Calebs Revenge
mradtke66
gopkrs
Pkrjones
tynimiller
Latest posts
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Calebs Revenge
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: tynimiller
11 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
13 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Who Will Start?
Latest: DoURant
Today at 10:56 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 10:39 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Draft evaluations--read then comment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top