Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2013 Draft Archive
Draft Day Trade Partners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 496921" data-attributes="member: 2846"><p>TT has done an amazing job. His trade up for Clay and many of his trade-backs have been very advantageous to the Packers. The analysis that was recently done that showed TT being superior in drafting was flawed. What it should have considered is just how many picks became good and not the percentage. When you do that, TT is likely superior to any other GM. His trading back and getting 2 picks should be evaluated as 1 pick. That is - if he starts with one pick trades back to get 2 picks and 1 pick becomes a pro bowler and the other gets cut - he started with 1 pick and ended with a pro bowler. That is more reflective of his success and strategy than saying he hit on 50% of his picks.</p><p> </p><p>As far as draft trade chart - one of the more overused things by draftnics. If I recall, the Matthew trade was lopsided 890-730 in favor of NE and Packer fans were upset. The Jennings trade back was also lopsided in favor of NE - they took WR jackson at our spot. We did well with that one too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AmishMafia, post: 496921, member: 2846"] TT has done an amazing job. His trade up for Clay and many of his trade-backs have been very advantageous to the Packers. The analysis that was recently done that showed TT being superior in drafting was flawed. What it should have considered is just how many picks became good and not the percentage. When you do that, TT is likely superior to any other GM. His trading back and getting 2 picks should be evaluated as 1 pick. That is - if he starts with one pick trades back to get 2 picks and 1 pick becomes a pro bowler and the other gets cut - he started with 1 pick and ended with a pro bowler. That is more reflective of his success and strategy than saying he hit on 50% of his picks. As far as draft trade chart - one of the more overused things by draftnics. If I recall, the Matthew trade was lopsided 890-730 in favor of NE and Packer fans were upset. The Jennings trade back was also lopsided in favor of NE - they took WR jackson at our spot. We did well with that one too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Calebs Revenge
Latest posts
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Dantés
Today at 2:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 2:44 PM
College Sports
Bucks 24-25 Season
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:28 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Packers Hire New Defensive Coordinator: Jeff Hafley, formerly Head Coach, Boston College
Latest: milani
Today at 12:19 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 12:17 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2013 Draft Archive
Draft Day Trade Partners
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top