Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Do we really need a OG/OT when we have Marshall Newhouse?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 365883" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><strong>"Do we really need a OG/OT when we have Marshall Newhouse?"</strong> </p><p> </p><p>IMO yes. Newhouse looked OK in the limited time we saw him in pre season and the staff is high on him. But there was a reason he was a fifth round draft pick who was inactive for every game until he went on IR in December. </p><p> </p><p>I think Lang is more of a sure thing than Newhouse and even Lang isn't a <strong>sure</strong> thing. I think Bulaga is more of a sure thing at LT than Lang is at LG, and IMO even Bulaga isn't a <strong>sure</strong> thing at LT. I hope and expect the Packers will select two OL in this draft. Not necessarily in the first round but I hope early and I hope the early one is an OT, not G/T. Versatility is great but look at Clifton - if he can "only" play LT, who cares? Much better to have rookie who can be great at OT instead of one who can be pretty good at OG, OT or OC. To get one of those guys probably means picking him early.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 365883, member: 4300"] [B]"Do we really need a OG/OT when we have Marshall Newhouse?"[/B] IMO yes. Newhouse looked OK in the limited time we saw him in pre season and the staff is high on him. But there was a reason he was a fifth round draft pick who was inactive for every game until he went on IR in December. I think Lang is more of a sure thing than Newhouse and even Lang isn't a [B]sure[/B] thing. I think Bulaga is more of a sure thing at LT than Lang is at LG, and IMO even Bulaga isn't a [B]sure[/B] thing at LT. I hope and expect the Packers will select two OL in this draft. Not necessarily in the first round but I hope early and I hope the early one is an OT, not G/T. Versatility is great but look at Clifton - if he can "only" play LT, who cares? Much better to have rookie who can be great at OT instead of one who can be pretty good at OG, OT or OC. To get one of those guys probably means picking him early. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
Latest posts
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
4 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Voyageur
25 minutes ago
College Sports
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: OldSchool101
50 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: PikeBadger
57 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: AmishMafia
Today at 5:02 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Do we really need a OG/OT when we have Marshall Newhouse?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top