Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Cornerbacks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 721096"><p>I don't think anybody games the board for their #61 pick from the point in time when #28 comes off the board.</p><p></p><p>There's some game planning for the first round where there's better clarity on what other teams are going to do, but by the time you get to the second round it's less predictable. If you're getting ready to pick at 29 while at the same time there's 3 other corners on the board you'd like at 61, you could easily be left holding your d*ck if you pass on the guy you love who is not a reach. The second round is know for runs on positions of depth.</p><p></p><p>Thompson claims they study other teams sufficiently that historically the guy they targeted at their low first round pick has in fact been on the board, and they pick him. From that standpoint, the kind of gaming you fear is not in play. On those occasions where the guy is not there, you should expect they'll take the best player among positions of need and importance while factoring in such things as position cap allocation and what they project for the next season's FA class.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 721096"] I don't think anybody games the board for their #61 pick from the point in time when #28 comes off the board. There's some game planning for the first round where there's better clarity on what other teams are going to do, but by the time you get to the second round it's less predictable. If you're getting ready to pick at 29 while at the same time there's 3 other corners on the board you'd like at 61, you could easily be left holding your d*ck if you pass on the guy you love who is not a reach. The second round is know for runs on positions of depth. Thompson claims they study other teams sufficiently that historically the guy they targeted at their low first round pick has in fact been on the board, and they pick him. From that standpoint, the kind of gaming you fear is not in play. On those occasions where the guy is not there, you should expect they'll take the best player among positions of need and importance while factoring in such things as position cap allocation and what they project for the next season's FA class. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
shockerx
Don Barclay
Half Empty
Latest posts
H
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:08 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: milani
Today at 5:28 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: longtimefan
Yesterday at 11:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 9:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Draft Review
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:00 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Cornerbacks
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top