Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2014 Draft Archive
Chris Borland
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrankRizzo" data-source="post: 551200" data-attributes="member: 2232"><p>Mayock is smarter and has more experience than Nawrocki, and he's been right more often.</p><p>If he doesn't have "credibility" with his former NFL playing experience, his many years scouting, and his contacts within the NFL, speaking to scouts, coaches, and GM's, then you can just believe what you want.</p><p></p><p>It's fine to "disagree" about prospects.</p><p>But pretending someone smarter and more connected than you is just not "credible" is either naive, ignorant, or arrogant, not sure which.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://blogs.seattletimes.com/seahawks/2014/02/24/mike-mayock-on-the-nfl-combine/" target="_blank">http://blogs.seattletimes.com/seahawks/2014/02/24/mike-mayock-on-the-nfl-combine/</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000316207/article/wisconsins-chris-borland-compared-to-panthers-luke-kuechly" target="_blank">http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000316207/article/wisconsins-chris-borland-compared-to-panthers-luke-kuechly</a></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://blogs.denverpost.com/broncos/2014/02/18/mike-mayock-might-good-fits-broncos-31/26504/" target="_blank">http://blogs.denverpost.com/broncos/2014/02/18/mike-mayock-might-good-fits-broncos-31/26504/</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://predominantlyorange.com/2014/03/28/2014-nfl-draft-wisconsin-lb-chris-borland-continues-connected-broncos/" target="_blank">http://predominantlyorange.com/2014/03/28/2014-nfl-draft-wisconsin-lb-chris-borland-continues-connected-broncos/</a></p><p></p><p>Again, I have no problem disagreeing with anyone on any prospect, from Manziel to Bridgewater to Pryor to Clinton-Dix, Mosley, Shazier, Borland, etc.</p><p></p><p>But it's quite astonishing to pretend that anyone who disagrees with your personal POV doesn't have any <em><strong>credibility</strong></em>.</p><p></p><p>On Borland, I guess I will agree to 100% disagree with you.</p><p>I dislike the Badgers and rooted against them often. Yet this guy impressed me and I am about as confident in him being a good to very good NFL ILB and right away as a rookie.</p><p>I saw Zach Thomas from his rookie year on.</p><p>I saw Sam Mills in New Orleans.</p><p>I have watched London Fletcher.</p><p>And I have watched Luke Keuchly.</p><p>Borland is in that discussion without question.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrankRizzo, post: 551200, member: 2232"] Mayock is smarter and has more experience than Nawrocki, and he's been right more often. If he doesn't have "credibility" with his former NFL playing experience, his many years scouting, and his contacts within the NFL, speaking to scouts, coaches, and GM's, then you can just believe what you want. It's fine to "disagree" about prospects. But pretending someone smarter and more connected than you is just not "credible" is either naive, ignorant, or arrogant, not sure which. [url]http://blogs.seattletimes.com/seahawks/2014/02/24/mike-mayock-on-the-nfl-combine/[/url] [url]http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000316207/article/wisconsins-chris-borland-compared-to-panthers-luke-kuechly[/url] [url]http://blogs.denverpost.com/broncos/2014/02/18/mike-mayock-might-good-fits-broncos-31/26504/[/url] [url]http://predominantlyorange.com/2014/03/28/2014-nfl-draft-wisconsin-lb-chris-borland-continues-connected-broncos/[/url] Again, I have no problem disagreeing with anyone on any prospect, from Manziel to Bridgewater to Pryor to Clinton-Dix, Mosley, Shazier, Borland, etc. But it's quite astonishing to pretend that anyone who disagrees with your personal POV doesn't have any [I][B]credibility[/B][/I]. On Borland, I guess I will agree to 100% disagree with you. I dislike the Badgers and rooted against them often. Yet this guy impressed me and I am about as confident in him being a good to very good NFL ILB and right away as a rookie. I saw Zach Thomas from his rookie year on. I saw Sam Mills in New Orleans. I have watched London Fletcher. And I have watched Luke Keuchly. Borland is in that discussion without question. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
Poppa San
* Team Owner *
Members online
kf323
Pkrjones
Poppa San
tynimiller
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
A moment ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Dantés
7 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Dantés
10 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #45 Edgerrin Cooper LB
Latest: Dantés
16 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: tynimiller
18 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2014 Draft Archive
Chris Borland
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top