Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Brian Brohm from Scouts.inc
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greg C." data-source="post: 223345" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>Yeah, Steve Young seemed to take it personally. I guess it's because his career was kind of like Rodgers' career up to this point--playing behind a legend before finally getting his chance to start. It probably is disappointing for Rodgers to now have a high draft pick looking over his shoulder. Just like it was disappointing for Favre when Rodgers was drafted in the first round. </p><p></p><p>While the Rodgers pick nudged Favre in the direction of retirement (something he had been considering publicly for several years already), at least Favre knew the starting job was his unless his play declined drastically. But with Rodgers being a new QB, we could have the dreaded "quarterback controversy" on our hands if (or should I saw "when"?) he has even one bad game. </p><p></p><p>One thing's for sure: The preseason will be very, very interesting. </p><p></p><p>I do agree with your basic point, packnic. The need for a second QB obviously takes precedence over the starting QB's feelings. Even Steve Young admitted at the end of his little rant that maybe this is what the Packers needed to do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greg C., post: 223345, member: 195"] Yeah, Steve Young seemed to take it personally. I guess it's because his career was kind of like Rodgers' career up to this point--playing behind a legend before finally getting his chance to start. It probably is disappointing for Rodgers to now have a high draft pick looking over his shoulder. Just like it was disappointing for Favre when Rodgers was drafted in the first round. While the Rodgers pick nudged Favre in the direction of retirement (something he had been considering publicly for several years already), at least Favre knew the starting job was his unless his play declined drastically. But with Rodgers being a new QB, we could have the dreaded "quarterback controversy" on our hands if (or should I saw "when"?) he has even one bad game. One thing's for sure: The preseason will be very, very interesting. I do agree with your basic point, packnic. The need for a second QB obviously takes precedence over the starting QB's feelings. Even Steve Young admitted at the end of his little rant that maybe this is what the Packers needed to do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
Guacamole
gopkrs
tynimiller
Emur
PackerDNA
Latest posts
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: tynimiller
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: DoURant
18 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: DoURant
Today at 5:26 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Brian Brohm from Scouts.inc
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top