Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Brett Favre: discussing all possibilities
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nelanator" data-source="post: 244897" data-attributes="member: 889"><p>No and no. Cutting ties with Favre in the first place was a testament to the fact that Brett Favre and his legacy was not bigger than the Green Bay Packers. Letting him suit up again just for the sake of it would mean that they would have to cut a guy to make room on the roster for just one day, it would be a slap in the face to Rogers, and it would say the exact oposite of what they said when they traded Favre last offseason. </p><p></p><p>And I should have said in my previous post that the only scenario close to this is signing him to a one-day contract <strong>in the offseason</strong>. Then they don't have to worry about the roster size and it is a nice, quiet, and symbolic way to let him end his career officially as a Packer. </p><p></p><p>Sorry guys, I just think that your notion of the Packers possibly allowing him to play agian for just one game and just for the sake of it is absolutely proposterous. Would help his legacy? Of course. But is it even feasible? Not at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nelanator, post: 244897, member: 889"] No and no. Cutting ties with Favre in the first place was a testament to the fact that Brett Favre and his legacy was not bigger than the Green Bay Packers. Letting him suit up again just for the sake of it would mean that they would have to cut a guy to make room on the roster for just one day, it would be a slap in the face to Rogers, and it would say the exact oposite of what they said when they traded Favre last offseason. And I should have said in my previous post that the only scenario close to this is signing him to a one-day contract [B]in the offseason[/B]. Then they don't have to worry about the roster size and it is a nice, quiet, and symbolic way to let him end his career officially as a Packer. Sorry guys, I just think that your notion of the Packers possibly allowing him to play agian for just one game and just for the sake of it is absolutely proposterous. Would help his legacy? Of course. But is it even feasible? Not at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
ThePerfectBeard
shockerx
Heyjoe4
weeds
sschind
Latest posts
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: AmishMafia
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
162-0
Latest: weeds
6 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Green Bay to Host '25 Draft!
Latest: weeds
12 minutes ago
NFL Discussions
S
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Schultz
Today at 5:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:58 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Brett Favre: discussing all possibilities
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top