Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Better Offense: 2010 Packers or 2009 Packers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kitten" data-source="post: 364722" data-attributes="member: 2692"><p>That is really tough. The problem is the 2010 team won the SB and that is enough to overshadow the 2009 team. An SB trumps everything, I went with 2010. While the 2009 team certainly put up the stats, they failed to clinch the deal with a healthy roster. The 2010 team, mind you with 15 guys on IR, still managed to win the SB. Statistically, 2009 is the better team, but it just goes to prove to you that the best team doesn't always win the SB. That team lost what could of been another SB year, back to back. </p><p></p><p>So who is the better team? The one with the all the stats and talent that failed to win the SB or the one plagued with injuries but still had the heart and spirit to win the SB? It really depends what you put more of an emphasis on, stats or SB wins. Value and talent of individual players?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kitten, post: 364722, member: 2692"] That is really tough. The problem is the 2010 team won the SB and that is enough to overshadow the 2009 team. An SB trumps everything, I went with 2010. While the 2009 team certainly put up the stats, they failed to clinch the deal with a healthy roster. The 2010 team, mind you with 15 guys on IR, still managed to win the SB. Statistically, 2009 is the better team, but it just goes to prove to you that the best team doesn't always win the SB. That team lost what could of been another SB year, back to back. So who is the better team? The one with the all the stats and talent that failed to win the SB or the one plagued with injuries but still had the heart and spirit to win the SB? It really depends what you put more of an emphasis on, stats or SB wins. Value and talent of individual players? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Lions Give Jared Goff a 4 year, 212M Extension
Latest: Dantés
14 minutes ago
NFL Discussions
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
15 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
31 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Calebs Revenge
53 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 8:56 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Better Offense: 2010 Packers or 2009 Packers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top