Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assistant Coach Tracker
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 814758"><p>That's fine. I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other. I'm not King's doctor. It's not like a Perry situation where it's one injury after another, year after year after year, where it is fair to judge the accumulation of injuries as a permanent diminishment of athletic ability, not just a reinjury risk.</p><p></p><p>I will say I was never on the King bandwagon to begin with. I haven't seen any on-the-field reasons so far to justify it. But whatever you spend in FA or the draft for a starting perimeter corner, which would be a substantial investment, is capital not available to be spent elsewhere. If he doesn't pan out in 2019, then I say address it for 2020.</p><p></p><p>Of course I come at this from the perspective that 2019 will not be a championship contending season, that good drafts need to be stacked, and if you expend substantial resources backstopping a risk like King you've bailed to some degree on the possibility of getting to that stack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 814758"] That's fine. I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other. I'm not King's doctor. It's not like a Perry situation where it's one injury after another, year after year after year, where it is fair to judge the accumulation of injuries as a permanent diminishment of athletic ability, not just a reinjury risk. I will say I was never on the King bandwagon to begin with. I haven't seen any on-the-field reasons so far to justify it. But whatever you spend in FA or the draft for a starting perimeter corner, which would be a substantial investment, is capital not available to be spent elsewhere. If he doesn't pan out in 2019, then I say address it for 2020. Of course I come at this from the perspective that 2019 will not be a championship contending season, that good drafts need to be stacked, and if you expend substantial resources backstopping a risk like King you've bailed to some degree on the possibility of getting to that stack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
PikeBadger
DoURant
Latest posts
NFL 2024 Weekly Predictions Contest: Week 9
Latest: Canadian Cheddar
9 minutes ago
NFL Discussions
All Things Brandon Mcnamus
Latest: OldSchool101
13 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pivotal Plays of Week 8 - Jaguars
Latest: OldSchool101
16 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs and Duds - Jacksonville
Latest: OldSchool101
25 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Jamin Davis (Former 1st Rounder) Picked Up - Discussion
Latest: OldSchool101
46 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assistant Coach Tracker
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top