Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are we really equipped to run a dominant 3-4?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 434156" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="color: #000000"> H</span></span><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">awk had 1.5 sacks, no INTs, no forced fumbles and no fumble recoveries. Do you remember any big impact plays he made – a big stop behind the LOS? A QB pressure at a critical time? In McGinn’s season-ending wrap up, he says Capers tried to hide Hawk in coverage and against the run he was a late reactor who took bad angles and was a step slow in pursuit. He missed 15 tackles. How would <em>you</em> grade him as a blitzer? McGinn gives him a D grade. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Bishop led the team with 148 tackles. He tied for the team lead in tackles for loss with 6.5. He forced two fumbles. And on a team desperate for a pass rush he was second in sacks with five. He led the team by generating one pressure every 6.85 rushes. And yes, unlike Hawk, thankfully he is a thumper. He loves to hit people - the defense could use a couple more who do. And he put those numbers up while missing three games. But he’s not good in coverage, no question about that. McGinn writes he was pressed into coverage because of Hawks liabilities in coverage. IOW, Hawk is even worse. McGinn gives him a B plus.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Of the ILBs, how can Bishop be the one you’re not sold on? </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">DJ Smith was pretty impressive at ILB but of the ILBs on the roster, I wonder if Francois might be the better replacement for Hawk? Smith is more like Bishop and Francois looked athletic in coverage. Either would have to take a substantial leap but they have their inside blitzer at LB in Bishop. His “partner” needs to be able to cover. </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 434156, member: 4300"] [FONT=Georgia][COLOR=#000000] H[/COLOR][/FONT][COLOR=windowtext][FONT=Tahoma]awk had 1.5 sacks, no INTs, no forced fumbles and no fumble recoveries. Do you remember any big impact plays he made – a big stop behind the LOS? A QB pressure at a critical time? In McGinn’s season-ending wrap up, he says Capers tried to hide Hawk in coverage and against the run he was a late reactor who took bad angles and was a step slow in pursuit. He missed 15 tackles. How would [I]you[/I] grade him as a blitzer? McGinn gives him a D grade. [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=windowtext][FONT=Tahoma]Bishop led the team with 148 tackles. He tied for the team lead in tackles for loss with 6.5. He forced two fumbles. And on a team desperate for a pass rush he was second in sacks with five. He led the team by generating one pressure every 6.85 rushes. And yes, unlike Hawk, thankfully he is a thumper. He loves to hit people - the defense could use a couple more who do. And he put those numbers up while missing three games. But he’s not good in coverage, no question about that. McGinn writes he was pressed into coverage because of Hawks liabilities in coverage. IOW, Hawk is even worse. McGinn gives him a B plus.[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=windowtext][FONT=Tahoma]Of the ILBs, how can Bishop be the one you’re not sold on? [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=windowtext][FONT=Tahoma]DJ Smith was pretty impressive at ILB but of the ILBs on the roster, I wonder if Francois might be the better replacement for Hawk? Smith is more like Bishop and Francois looked athletic in coverage. Either would have to take a substantial leap but they have their inside blitzer at LB in Bishop. His “partner” needs to be able to cover. [/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
G
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: GleefulGary
41 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 3:00 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 2:51 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: rmontro
Today at 2:03 AM
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:51 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are we really equipped to run a dominant 3-4?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top