Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Anyone else feeling queesy about our depth chart?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 510366"><p>Nonsense might be the wrong word. Absurd is more apt, I think. Nobody can build a team like that. Even with respect to the draft, any false illusions about "best player available" went out the window with the 2012 draft.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I see little evidence of that. Other than the schematic switch from FBs to H-backs two years ago, their head count by position is very consistent. On offense, the only head count difference now vs. last year at this time is that we're carrying 8 O-Line instead of 7 and 5 WR instead of 6. On defense, if one counts Neal as an OLB (which he is) and Woodson as a safety last season (which he was), I believe the only difference year-over-year is that we're carrying one more D-Line and one less LB.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>At the risk of repeating myself, the goal with the backup QB on this team should be to have a guy who can win a game against a poor-to-mediocre team.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 510366"] Nonsense might be the wrong word. Absurd is more apt, I think. Nobody can build a team like that. Even with respect to the draft, any false illusions about "best player available" went out the window with the 2012 draft. I see little evidence of that. Other than the schematic switch from FBs to H-backs two years ago, their head count by position is very consistent. On offense, the only head count difference now vs. last year at this time is that we're carrying 8 O-Line instead of 7 and 5 WR instead of 6. On defense, if one counts Neal as an OLB (which he is) and Woodson as a safety last season (which he was), I believe the only difference year-over-year is that we're carrying one more D-Line and one less LB. At the risk of repeating myself, the goal with the backup QB on this team should be to have a guy who can win a game against a poor-to-mediocre team. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
sschind
King of Jeans
XPack
Latest posts
S
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Schultz
40 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:58 AM
Draft Talk
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Yesterday at 10:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Anyone else feeling queesy about our depth chart?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top