Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
A peek ahead to 2013
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raptorman" data-source="post: 471646" data-attributes="member: 655"><p><span style="font-family: 'arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Broke it down more for you guys. Back to the Packers in 1996. While having a top RB is not a requirement, having one or two that gets you at least 1200 yards helps. </span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>[CODE]Packers 1996 Bennett 899 Levens 566 1465 Yards</p><p>Broncos 1997 Davis 1750 Hebron 222 1972 Yards</p><p>Broncos 1998 David 2008 Loville 161 2169 Yards</p><p>Rams 1999 Faulk 1381 Holcombe 294 1675 Yards</p><p>Ravens 2000 Lewis 1364 Holnes 588 1952 Yards</p><p>Pats 2001 Smith 1157 Faulk 169 1326 Yards</p><p>Tampa 2002 Pittman 718 Alstott 548 1329 Yards</p><p>Pats 2003 Smith 642 Faulk 638 1280 Yards</p><p>Pats 2004 Dillon 1635 Faulk 255 1890 Yards</p><p>Pitt 2005 Bettis 1202 Bettis 368 1570 Yards</p><p>Colts 2006 Addi 1081 Rhodes 641 1722 Yards</p><p>Giants 2007 Jacobs 1009 Ward 602 1611 Yards</p><p>Pitt 2008 Parker 791 Moore 588 1379 Yards</p><p>Saints 2009 Thomas 793 Bell 655 1448 Yards</p><p>Packers 2010 Jackson 703 Khun 281 984 Yards</p><p>Giants 2011 Jacobs 571 Bradshaw 659 1230 Yards</p><p>[/CODE]</p><p> </p><p>Edit: I would also point out that in 2010 Khun was not the Packers second leading rusher. Rodgers was, with I think 385 yards. Same with Denver in 98(?), Elway was their second leading rusher.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raptorman, post: 471646, member: 655"] [FONT=arial][SIZE=3]Broke it down more for you guys. Back to the Packers in 1996. While having a top RB is not a requirement, having one or two that gets you at least 1200 yards helps. [/SIZE][/FONT] [CODE]Packers 1996 Bennett 899 Levens 566 1465 Yards Broncos 1997 Davis 1750 Hebron 222 1972 Yards Broncos 1998 David 2008 Loville 161 2169 Yards Rams 1999 Faulk 1381 Holcombe 294 1675 Yards Ravens 2000 Lewis 1364 Holnes 588 1952 Yards Pats 2001 Smith 1157 Faulk 169 1326 Yards Tampa 2002 Pittman 718 Alstott 548 1329 Yards Pats 2003 Smith 642 Faulk 638 1280 Yards Pats 2004 Dillon 1635 Faulk 255 1890 Yards Pitt 2005 Bettis 1202 Bettis 368 1570 Yards Colts 2006 Addi 1081 Rhodes 641 1722 Yards Giants 2007 Jacobs 1009 Ward 602 1611 Yards Pitt 2008 Parker 791 Moore 588 1379 Yards Saints 2009 Thomas 793 Bell 655 1448 Yards Packers 2010 Jackson 703 Khun 281 984 Yards Giants 2011 Jacobs 571 Bradshaw 659 1230 Yards [/CODE] Edit: I would also point out that in 2010 Khun was not the Packers second leading rusher. Rodgers was, with I think 385 yards. Same with Denver in 98(?), Elway was their second leading rusher. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Calebs Revenge
Curly Calhoun
Azpackfan4
Latest posts
Transfer Portal and How It Has Changed College Sports
Latest: Pkrjones
24 minutes ago
College Sports
C
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 2:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 2:24 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:27 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
A peek ahead to 2013
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top