Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2021 CBA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 865800"><p>This would be a good place to post CBA progress and terms as things develop. However, I don't think we need another endless debate over the pros and cons of a 17 game season. There's a separate thread for that fait accompli.</p><p></p><p>The negotiated CBA has been approved by the player reps, albeit by a narrow margin, 17 for, 14 against, 1 abstain, evidently against the 6-5 no vote by the union executive committee. Approval requires only a simple majority of the rank and file.</p><p></p><p>The package includes a 17 game schedule beginning in 2021, 3 preseason games, and lighter player requirements in OTAs and camp. Additional provisions, including roster expansion, are highlighted in the link below.</p><p></p><p>Given the player rep recommendation odds are this deal will pass. According to the following article it will take some weeks to finalize the legalese with the player vote butting up against the opening of the free agent negotiating period on March 16.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28783678/nflpa-reps-vote-send-proposed-cba-full-membership-approval" target="_blank">https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28783678/nflpa-reps-vote-send-proposed-cba-full-membership-approval</a></p><p></p><p>Teams have been slow to move on their own free agents, not just the Packers, given the uncertainties of how the final deal will affect the cap beginning in 2021. If the "yes" vote comes through on time, the free agent period (or maybe beginning in the week or days prior) should be faster and more furious than usual.</p><p></p><p>That article notes that Aaron Rodgers, the Packers player rep, was a "force" in the meetings getting to this point. That would suggest he was on the "yes" side. Ironically, Sherman, who is on the executive committee, had been against the terms in an earlier report and may have been the deciding no vote of the committee.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 865800"] This would be a good place to post CBA progress and terms as things develop. However, I don't think we need another endless debate over the pros and cons of a 17 game season. There's a separate thread for that fait accompli. The negotiated CBA has been approved by the player reps, albeit by a narrow margin, 17 for, 14 against, 1 abstain, evidently against the 6-5 no vote by the union executive committee. Approval requires only a simple majority of the rank and file. The package includes a 17 game schedule beginning in 2021, 3 preseason games, and lighter player requirements in OTAs and camp. Additional provisions, including roster expansion, are highlighted in the link below. Given the player rep recommendation odds are this deal will pass. According to the following article it will take some weeks to finalize the legalese with the player vote butting up against the opening of the free agent negotiating period on March 16. [URL]https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28783678/nflpa-reps-vote-send-proposed-cba-full-membership-approval[/URL] Teams have been slow to move on their own free agents, not just the Packers, given the uncertainties of how the final deal will affect the cap beginning in 2021. If the "yes" vote comes through on time, the free agent period (or maybe beginning in the week or days prior) should be faster and more furious than usual. That article notes that Aaron Rodgers, the Packers player rep, was a "force" in the meetings getting to this point. That would suggest he was on the "yes" side. Ironically, Sherman, who is on the executive committee, had been against the terms in an earlier report and may have been the deciding no vote of the committee. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 11:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: longtimefan
Yesterday at 11:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 9:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Draft Review
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:00 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2021 CBA
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top