Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2016 Draft Archive
17th Annual Draft Contest
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 663824"><p>Maybe we should have a contest where we re-pick the draft the way <strong><em>we</em></strong> would do it, not the way we think <strong><em>Thompson </em></strong>will do, based on who was actually on the board at each pick. Then check back in a year and see how it worked out. The only thing that stops me is that it would be cheating. For example, if you know Murphy will be available in the 6th. you're not going to draft him the 5th., a not insignificant advantage.</p><p></p><p>The first round is not cheating, though, and with that I would have gone with Ragland, enlarged aorta or not.</p><p></p><p>I hold firmly to the opinion that Kendricks would have been the better pick in the first round last year, and Ragland is even a better player.</p><p></p><p>In the absence of a bunch of playmakers as in 2010, having a very firm hand in the center of the field goes chronically underappreciated. Martinez will help in dime. Ryan and Barrington is a decent combination, but lacks that special sauce.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 663824"] Maybe we should have a contest where we re-pick the draft the way [B][I]we[/I][/B] would do it, not the way we think [B][I]Thompson [/I][/B]will do, based on who was actually on the board at each pick. Then check back in a year and see how it worked out. The only thing that stops me is that it would be cheating. For example, if you know Murphy will be available in the 6th. you're not going to draft him the 5th., a not insignificant advantage. The first round is not cheating, though, and with that I would have gone with Ragland, enlarged aorta or not. I hold firmly to the opinion that Kendricks would have been the better pick in the first round last year, and Ragland is even a better player. In the absence of a bunch of playmakers as in 2010, having a very firm hand in the center of the field goes chronically underappreciated. Martinez will help in dime. Ryan and Barrington is a decent combination, but lacks that special sauce. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Update on Watson's Hamstrngs
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 10:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OTAs
Latest: AmishMafia
Yesterday at 10:25 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 2:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Aaron Hill !!!
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 1:36 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Krabs
Thursday at 9:54 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2016 Draft Archive
17th Annual Draft Contest
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top