Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
You are the coach for tonights game.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 462892" data-attributes="member: 4199"><p>I'm not sure about this. A 'real' cover-2 means the corners are pressing the wide guy. They chuck him and then cover the flat. Now if they walk their corners back, by all means, do that.</p><p> </p><p>A better way to beat tampa-2 is to flood the zones with a short, medium, and deep route. A 2 yard out, a 10 yard corner, and a seam to the same side should give you one open option. Trips to one side also helps break zones.</p><p> </p><p>My base the game would be normal 3wr, 1TE, 1TB, align with a TE on the line but flexed slightly and two wides split out--a flanker and a slot. Jordy by himself on the other side. This should cause the Bears to shift towards the trips, giving Jordy the advantage. If not, crossing routes and flooding the zone should tip the balance in our favor.</p><p> </p><p>As a chance up, I'd bunch the trips guys. Split the TE out and have the wides one to each side. Again, crossing routes. This should defeat press coverage, as you can't press the wides (they're off the line) and Finley should destroy any CB attempting to press him.</p><p> </p><p>On Defense, I'd like to see more base 3-4. I liked the amount we played it against the 49ers (as an impression anyway. For all I know, we played less than average. haven't seen the stats yet). And I'd like some cover-1, bring Woodson in the box to roam, blitz, or let our front 5 rush more often.</p><p> </p><p>Perhaps this would be a good week for a Psycho package, now that we have 4 good rushing backers. Walden, Matthews, Perry, and Moses make for an impressive, though not fearful, group. As a change up, let Perry put his hand in the dirt in this set, giving us a normal-for-us nickel look with two down rushers (Worthy and Perry), two outside guys, (Walden and Moses), and two inside guys (Matthews and Smith.) I'm putting Matthews in the middle for this set just because he's the most complete player. And moving him around might make the Bears ignore the other guys a bit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mradtke66, post: 462892, member: 4199"] I'm not sure about this. A 'real' cover-2 means the corners are pressing the wide guy. They chuck him and then cover the flat. Now if they walk their corners back, by all means, do that. A better way to beat tampa-2 is to flood the zones with a short, medium, and deep route. A 2 yard out, a 10 yard corner, and a seam to the same side should give you one open option. Trips to one side also helps break zones. My base the game would be normal 3wr, 1TE, 1TB, align with a TE on the line but flexed slightly and two wides split out--a flanker and a slot. Jordy by himself on the other side. This should cause the Bears to shift towards the trips, giving Jordy the advantage. If not, crossing routes and flooding the zone should tip the balance in our favor. As a chance up, I'd bunch the trips guys. Split the TE out and have the wides one to each side. Again, crossing routes. This should defeat press coverage, as you can't press the wides (they're off the line) and Finley should destroy any CB attempting to press him. On Defense, I'd like to see more base 3-4. I liked the amount we played it against the 49ers (as an impression anyway. For all I know, we played less than average. haven't seen the stats yet). And I'd like some cover-1, bring Woodson in the box to roam, blitz, or let our front 5 rush more often. Perhaps this would be a good week for a Psycho package, now that we have 4 good rushing backers. Walden, Matthews, Perry, and Moses make for an impressive, though not fearful, group. As a change up, let Perry put his hand in the dirt in this set, giving us a normal-for-us nickel look with two down rushers (Worthy and Perry), two outside guys, (Walden and Moses), and two inside guys (Matthews and Smith.) I'm putting Matthews in the middle for this set just because he's the most complete player. And moving him around might make the Bears ignore the other guys a bit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: rmontro
18 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:15 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:51 AM
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
Today at 12:23 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
You are the coach for tonights game.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top