Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
You are the coach for tonights game.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 462870" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">I don't think you win with gimmicks so I wouldn't take the ball out of Rodgers hands and put it in Cobb's. One play in wildcat or one option pass is one thing, more than that doesn't make sense to me.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Jennings is likely to miss the game so quick screens to WRs is a good idea. I'd like to see Cobb nearly full time on offense and then just as PR. The Bears weakness is their secondary. "Peanut" Tillman will play but he's injured and the rest of their CBs don't scare anyone. If you can block their rush, Rodgers should have a big day.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Less fullback except on short yardage. The one back set spreads the D out more and opens it up more for the run game. I'd rather have the ball in Benson's or Green's hands than Kuhn's. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Shields' play vs. the 9ers earned him the starting CB job IMO. Hayward would come off the bench before Bush if it were up to me. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Worthy at NT is a horrible idea IMO - not enough 'lead in his pants'. His best spot is as a DT in the sub packages, switching him around is as foolish as having Sherrod play OG last TC IMO. If you don’t want Raji at NT, Pickett is next in line. BTW, Pickett has to pick up his play from Sunday. It's not a good thing to have such a big man become invisible. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Woodson at FS is another horrible idea IMO. The closer to the LOS he is the more Woodson excels; putting him deep in the secondary would be a favor to the Bears whose weakness on O is their OL. Even when he isn't blitzing, Woodson's threat to rush the passer should free up others. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 462870, member: 4300"] [SIZE=3][FONT=Tahoma]I don't think you win with gimmicks so I wouldn't take the ball out of Rodgers hands and put it in Cobb's. One play in wildcat or one option pass is one thing, more than that doesn't make sense to me.[/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][FONT=Tahoma]Jennings is likely to miss the game so quick screens to WRs is a good idea. I'd like to see Cobb nearly full time on offense and then just as PR. The Bears weakness is their secondary. "Peanut" Tillman will play but he's injured and the rest of their CBs don't scare anyone. If you can block their rush, Rodgers should have a big day.[/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][FONT=Tahoma]Less fullback except on short yardage. The one back set spreads the D out more and opens it up more for the run game. I'd rather have the ball in Benson's or Green's hands than Kuhn's. [/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][FONT=Tahoma]Shields' play vs. the 9ers earned him the starting CB job IMO. Hayward would come off the bench before Bush if it were up to me. [/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][FONT=Tahoma]Worthy at NT is a horrible idea IMO - not enough 'lead in his pants'. His best spot is as a DT in the sub packages, switching him around is as foolish as having Sherrod play OG last TC IMO. If you don’t want Raji at NT, Pickett is next in line. BTW, Pickett has to pick up his play from Sunday. It's not a good thing to have such a big man become invisible. [/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][FONT=Tahoma]Woodson at FS is another horrible idea IMO. The closer to the LOS he is the more Woodson excels; putting him deep in the secondary would be a favor to the Bears whose weakness on O is their OL. Even when he isn't blitzing, Woodson's threat to rush the passer should free up others. [/FONT][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Thirteen Below
39 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:51 AM
Draft Talk
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:44 AM
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
Today at 12:23 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
You are the coach for tonights game.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top