Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hauschild" data-source="post: 265597" data-attributes="member: 1638">Rankings are a decent indicator, but again you have to do additional research and break down each match-up if you want more accuracy - think of them as a barometer, I guess, for potential danger lying ahead.Look, you people are CLEARLY adamant that you do NOT want to be convinced that Brett Favre doesn't suck in certain months, or at all.  I simply cannot sit back idly by and allow the haters to peddle their ******** without challenging their transparent arguments - which I've done a decent job of, for the most part.Here's Brett's bod of work in 2009:4202 Yards68.4 Completion Percentage7.9 Average33 TD's 7 INT's34 Sacks (Most since 1999)107.2 QB Rating (Previous best - 99.5)I think it could be argued that Brett's moving himself into a new plateau of efficiency and production at the ripe old age of 40.  I think the "real" question we all should be arguing is why Brett couldn't reasonably be expected to play another 5 years???</blockquote>

Total: 341 (members: 3, guests: 338)