Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
WR Past
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackFan2" data-source="post: 905983" data-attributes="member: 10749"><p>It was a good read. Basically, draft picks after 100 pick, on average is a boom or bust. Either you get a relatively good player that plays a decent amount of games for you or barely any games. Picks 1- 100 are generally "safer" picks that should garner more weight.</p><p></p><p>For example the coefficient of variation graph they show, the black line is the predicted regression line. You see picks 1 - 100, they're close to that predicted regression line. Hence, you sorta know what you're going to get. After picks 100, on average, it becomes less predictable with highs and lows (more variability).</p><p></p><p>The issue here is that it's taking into account ALL averages (regardless of position). If we break it down and aggregate it by position the variability does change.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://greg-hart.medium.com/analyzing-nfl-draft-positions-by-av-663a2633fc04" target="_blank">https://greg-hart.medium.com/analyzing-nfl-draft-positions-by-av-663a2633fc04</a></p><p></p><p>^The article by Hart does a better job. It allows us not to just see the averages but also lets us see the outliers by rounds.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackFan2, post: 905983, member: 10749"] It was a good read. Basically, draft picks after 100 pick, on average is a boom or bust. Either you get a relatively good player that plays a decent amount of games for you or barely any games. Picks 1- 100 are generally "safer" picks that should garner more weight. For example the coefficient of variation graph they show, the black line is the predicted regression line. You see picks 1 - 100, they're close to that predicted regression line. Hence, you sorta know what you're going to get. After picks 100, on average, it becomes less predictable with highs and lows (more variability). The issue here is that it's taking into account ALL averages (regardless of position). If we break it down and aggregate it by position the variability does change. [URL]https://greg-hart.medium.com/analyzing-nfl-draft-positions-by-av-663a2633fc04[/URL] ^The article by Hart does a better job. It allows us not to just see the averages but also lets us see the outliers by rounds. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DABIGZ
Curly Calhoun
Darth Garfunkel
Latest posts
Pick 198 Warren Brinson DT Georgia
Latest: DoURant
Today at 3:46 PM
Draft Talk
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 2:24 PM
College Sports
H
Final Thoughts on 2025 Draft
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 2:07 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 1:54 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
WR Past
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top