Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 884384" data-attributes="member: 6578">Anyone somewhat regular here knows I believed EQ would and should have played into possibly our #3...that was however before this latest injury. I have zero clue what to expect at this point once back. I do know I'd put his intelligence against nearly anyone in our locker room...that however doesn't equal high output - time will tell.I think it is time folks stop blasting MVS for what he isn't and start embracing the WR he is. The dude can do and does do things no other receiver on our roster can do (Adams included). He is to me, the PERFECT #3 type guy to have and to have around a long time. Some games he will blow defenses open, put up nearly 200 yards and 2 tds while averaging 35+ yards a catch - then the next game the other team makes sure he doesn't blow the top, he catches one ball on two targets for 12 yards....Expect him to be a teams primary or surefire #2, you'll be disappointed at least half the time.</blockquote>

Total: 956 (members: 2, guests: 954)