Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 884312">Most importantly the Packers wouldn't have been able to take advantage of having a starting quarterback on a rookie deal, something that is extremely valuable under the current CBA but conveniently ignored around here.Do you honestly believe that any of Goff, Wentz, Lynch, Trubisky or Watson have a realistic chance to develop into HOFers?You understand that Gutekunst has a much different approach to building the roster than Thompson, don't you?Under Thompson the Packers were annually amongst the league leaders in snaps played by rookies, an approach you claimed to be the smart way.This year, the team doesn't get close to any out of their draft picks. But now you claim that to be the best approach.So tell me, which one is it in your opinion???There's no way Newton comes anywhere close to making it to Canton, Ryan doesn't deserve to be inducted either.It's true that Luck had a decent chance nut he was considered a generational talent, something that definitely doesn't apply to Love.It's definitely odd to evaluate MVS based on a single play but boy did he look clueless on it.</blockquote>

Total: 977 (members: 2, guests: 975)