Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Worth reading: MM's and TT's future, possible GM candidates
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 556448"><p>You can imagine my disappointment in reading Brandt's comments to the affect that the Rodgers was not perceived as a need pick despite Favre's age and count-me-in-count-me-out roller coaster. The fact it was not considered a need pick, with the foresight that he'd be the starter before his rookie deal ran out, is a strike against Thompson, not a point in his favor. A first round pick with no plan? Really?</p><p></p><p>When a GM first takes the job he knows he's going to get 5 years to make his mark unless he turns out to be surprisingly dreadful. Thompson certainly earned his rep in the first few years on the job...McCarthy and Rodgers as you say, even if the latter was without any plan. Let's not forget bringing in Woodson, without whom there would have been no SB championship.</p><p></p><p>However, the drafts have on balance gotten progressively weaker as the years have gone by, and there's been a notable lack of creativity and imagination in both the draft and free agent markets.</p><p></p><p>Thompson has gotten too comfortable in my opinion. And you don't need to bestow me the right to it...that's a given.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 556448"] You can imagine my disappointment in reading Brandt's comments to the affect that the Rodgers was not perceived as a need pick despite Favre's age and count-me-in-count-me-out roller coaster. The fact it was not considered a need pick, with the foresight that he'd be the starter before his rookie deal ran out, is a strike against Thompson, not a point in his favor. A first round pick with no plan? Really? When a GM first takes the job he knows he's going to get 5 years to make his mark unless he turns out to be surprisingly dreadful. Thompson certainly earned his rep in the first few years on the job...McCarthy and Rodgers as you say, even if the latter was without any plan. Let's not forget bringing in Woodson, without whom there would have been no SB championship. However, the drafts have on balance gotten progressively weaker as the years have gone by, and there's been a notable lack of creativity and imagination in both the draft and free agent markets. Thompson has gotten too comfortable in my opinion. And you don't need to bestow me the right to it...that's a given. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Half Empty
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: gopkrs
11 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:07 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:43 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Half Empty
Today at 8:32 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 7:44 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Worth reading: MM's and TT's future, possible GM candidates
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top