Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
With their 1st Pick in the 2018 NFL Draft the Packers select...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 772817"><p>Adams was promising in his first year, injured in his second.</p><p></p><p>As a rookie, Spriggs did not play a whole lot, and when he did it was often as a TE run blocker. In his second season, he got called out by his head coach for a poor work ethic. Then he played better.</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't say the Packers are uncomfortable with Spriggs at RT going into the season. I also couldn't say they are comfortable with that outcome either.</p><p></p><p>What I am saying is two things have to happen to discount the idea of an OT on day 2 of the draft. They have to think Bulaga will be able to play and Spriggs has more upside. Otherwise there's nobody on the bench to backup at OT. Murphy has been nothing but terrible at OT and should be moved to OG or cut; McCray proved serviceable in a pinch at OT but he's penciled in at RG. The backup OG/C depth is nothing to write home about either.</p><p></p><p>If questions exists with either Bulaga or Spriggs, it would make a lot of sense to invest something in an OT who might also swing to OG if needed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 772817"] Adams was promising in his first year, injured in his second. As a rookie, Spriggs did not play a whole lot, and when he did it was often as a TE run blocker. In his second season, he got called out by his head coach for a poor work ethic. Then he played better. I wouldn't say the Packers are uncomfortable with Spriggs at RT going into the season. I also couldn't say they are comfortable with that outcome either. What I am saying is two things have to happen to discount the idea of an OT on day 2 of the draft. They have to think Bulaga will be able to play and Spriggs has more upside. Otherwise there's nobody on the bench to backup at OT. Murphy has been nothing but terrible at OT and should be moved to OG or cut; McCray proved serviceable in a pinch at OT but he's penciled in at RG. The backup OG/C depth is nothing to write home about either. If questions exists with either Bulaga or Spriggs, it would make a lot of sense to invest something in an OT who might also swing to OG if needed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
With their 1st Pick in the 2018 NFL Draft the Packers select...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top