Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 772778">Yes, I noted that consideration at the time of that draft and just acknowledged that same point as a possibility so it would not need to be repeated back to me.  It was perhaps a year-in-advance contingency.  Or a double contingency given Bulaga's missing chunks of 3 out of 5 seasons to that point.Now, to repeat further, the current situation may well be more acute with that very same Spriggs penciled in at RT if Bulaga can't play.  And even if he can, the accumulated injuries suggest he may not play up to his heretofor best level. Bulaga's contract belies the contention the Packers do not value the RT position.</blockquote>

Total: 945 (members: 1, guests: 944)