Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
With their 1st Pick in the 2018 NFL Draft the Packers select...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 772225" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>No doubt. Here's the specific hypothetical that, in theory, would meet that specific set of requirements:</p><p></p><p>Lamar Jackson (or possibly another QB) being coveted by the Cardinals, Ravens, and Chargers or some combination thereof. </p><p></p><p>As far as finding a partner on short notice, most of the time trades that happen during the draft have been discussed in principle before the draft. </p><p></p><p>If (and it's a big "if"), the Ravens and/or Chargers want Jackson and fear that Arizona would take him, they may have already spoken to GB about the terms of a possible trade up. Those pre-draft discussions mitigate the problems associated with the time crunch when one is on the clock.</p><p></p><p>I would also add that when coveted QB's are involved, the value chart becomes quite a bit less accurate.</p><p></p><p>For instance, the Jets sent #6 (1600), #37 (530), #49 (410), and a 2019 2nd to the Colts for #3 (2200). That 2019 2nd is hard to value. If we just place it smack dab in the middle of the 2nd round, it's 420. But future picks have historically been valued at a number a round later than picks in the present draft. So if it's currently valued as a mid 3rd, it's 190.</p><p></p><p>All that together means that the Jets gave 2730 points up to get 2200 back. That 530 point difference is the equivalent of a high 2nd round pick that was "overpaid" per the chart. So hypothetically, if there are multiple teams coveting Jackson or some other falling QB, the Packers might be able to get a good bit more than what the chart would say they should.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 772225, member: 12283"] No doubt. Here's the specific hypothetical that, in theory, would meet that specific set of requirements: Lamar Jackson (or possibly another QB) being coveted by the Cardinals, Ravens, and Chargers or some combination thereof. As far as finding a partner on short notice, most of the time trades that happen during the draft have been discussed in principle before the draft. If (and it's a big "if"), the Ravens and/or Chargers want Jackson and fear that Arizona would take him, they may have already spoken to GB about the terms of a possible trade up. Those pre-draft discussions mitigate the problems associated with the time crunch when one is on the clock. I would also add that when coveted QB's are involved, the value chart becomes quite a bit less accurate. For instance, the Jets sent #6 (1600), #37 (530), #49 (410), and a 2019 2nd to the Colts for #3 (2200). That 2019 2nd is hard to value. If we just place it smack dab in the middle of the 2nd round, it's 420. But future picks have historically been valued at a number a round later than picks in the present draft. So if it's currently valued as a mid 3rd, it's 190. All that together means that the Jets gave 2730 points up to get 2200 back. That 530 point difference is the equivalent of a high 2nd round pick that was "overpaid" per the chart. So hypothetically, if there are multiple teams coveting Jackson or some other falling QB, the Packers might be able to get a good bit more than what the chart would say they should. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
monte smith
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
With their 1st Pick in the 2018 NFL Draft the Packers select...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top