Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 772072" data-attributes="member: 10086">The only reason I would consider a trade back from #14 is because this is year may be the exception to all years.  The QB crop is weighted heavier at the top.  It's conceivable that a team wanting a QB remaining at #14 would pay to get said QB as if they were picking in the top 10.  We have already confessed to be building from the ground up this year and that requires the correct player fits on both sides of the ball  Imagine moving back 5-10 spots but getting an additional 2nd rounder both this year and next.  Then packaging this years trade player (2nd rounder etc..or whatever) with our 2nd rounder to move back into the latter half of day 1 for a second time.One could argue that the having 2 players picked top #20-#30 overall will give us every bit as good a chance to land 1 solid starter as 1 player picked at #14.   Not to mention that if one goes down with the GB injury bug then we haven't lost all our resources at the top end.  We could very well have a combination of Edge and either CB, OG or WR locked up by pick #25, with another day 2 pick next year to assist the mini rebuild.  Even if we have to use a comp pick to accomplish this it could make some sense.</blockquote>

Total: 940 (members: 1, guests: 939)